A Review of Carbon Capture Technologies: Current Capture Technologies, Challenges, and Future Development
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61173/zn85ax33Keywords:
Carbon dioxide, Carbon capture and storage, Carbon capture technology, Carbon treatmentAbstract
Nowadays, global warming has become one of the significant issues that humans are facing. Carbon capture technologies, as essential tools to mitigate carbon dioxide (CO₂) emissions, have been applied in power plants and industrial processes globally. This paper examines prevalent carbon capture technologies by reviewing the relevant principles and research progress in the field of carbon capture. Three combustion configurations: pre-combustion, post-combustion, and oxy-fuel combustion are elaborated in this review concerning carbon capture. Pre-combustion carbon capture extracts CO₂ before the combustion process, transforming the hydrocarbon fuels into syngas which are composed of CO₂ and hydrogen for later combustion. Post-combustion carbon capture aims to capture CO₂ after the combustions. Various techniques can be applied for carbon capture after the combustion, with chemical absorption and membrane separation widely used. Oxy-fuel combustion uses pure oxygen to accomplish the combustion so that the exhausted gases can mainly composed of CO₂ and water vapor, which is easy for CO₂ capture. This paper also highlights the critical role that carbon capture technologies will play in Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) and emphasizes the current technology drawbacks. It provides a reference for future carbon capture studies and developments, which will be crucial for achieving international climate goals.References
[1] Ripple W J, Wolf C, Gregg J W, et al. The 2023 state of the climate report: Entering uncharted territory[J]. BioScience, 2023, 73(12): 841-850.
[2] Das A, Peu S D, Hossain M S, et al. Advancements in adsorption based carbon dioxide capture technologies-A comprehensive review[J]. Heliyon, 2023, 9(12), e22341.
[3] Heede R. Tracing anthropogenic carbon dioxide and methane emissions to fossil fuel and cement producers, 1854–2010[J]. Climatic change, 2014, 122(1): 229-241.
[4] Holechek J L, Geli H M E, Sawalhah M N, et al. A global assessment: can renewable energy replace fossil fuels by 2050 [J]. Sustainability, 2022, 14(8): 4792.
[5] Ahmad, H. H., Saleem, F., & Arif, H. Evaluation of Catastrophic Global Warming due to Coal Combustion, Paradigm of South Asia. International Journal of Innovations in Science and Technology, 2021, 3(4), 198–207.
[6] Roussanaly S, Berghout N, Fout T, et al. Towards improved cost evaluation of Carbon Capture and Storage from industry[J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2021, 106: 103263.
[7] Subraveti S G, Rodríguez Angel E, Ramírez A, et al. Is carbon capture and storage (CCS) really so expensive? An analysis of cascading costs and CO2 emissions reduction of industrial CCS implementation on the construction of a bridge[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2023, 57(6): 2595-2601.
[8] Dziejarski, B., Krzyżyńska, R., & Andersson, K. Current status of carbon capture, utilization, and storage technologies in the global economy: A survey of technical assessment. Fuel, 2023, 342, 127776.
[9] Boot-Handford M E, Abanades J C, Anthony E J, et al. Carbon capture and storage update[J]. Energy & Environmental Science, 2014, 7(1): 130-189.
[10] Wu H, Zhang X, Wu Q. Research progress of carbon capture technology based on alcohol amine solution[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2023: 125715.
[11] Eide L I, Bailey D W. Precombustion Decarbonisation Processes[J/OL]. Oil & Gas Science and Technology, 2005, 60(3): 475-484.
[12] Baraj, E., Ciahotný, K., & Hlinčík, T. The water gas shift reaction: Catalysts and reaction mechanism. Fuel,2021, 288, 119817.
[13] Chen Z. A Review of Pre-combustion Carbon Capture Technology[C]//2022 7th International Conference on Social Sciences and Economic Development (ICSSED 2022). Atlantis Press, 2022: 524-528.
[14] Hoeger C, Burt S, Baxter L. Cryogenic carbon capture™ technoeconomic analysis[C]//Proceedings of the 15th Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies Conference. 2021: 15-18.
[15] Wang X, Song C. Carbon capture from flue gas and the atmosphere: A perspective[J]. Frontiers in Energy Research, 2020, 8: 560849.
[16] Alalaiwat D, Khan E. Current status and future scenarios of carbon capture from power plants emission: a review[J/OL]. Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology, 2023, 22(3): 799-822.
[17] Chao C, Deng Y, Dewil R, et al. Post-combustion carbon capture[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2021, 138: 110490.
[18] Belaissaoui, B., & Favre, E. Membrane Separation Processes for Post-Combustion Carbon Dioxide Capture: State of the Art and Critical Overview. Oil & Gas Science and Technology – Revue d’IFP Energies Nouvelles, 2013, 69(6), 1005–1020.
[19] Fu, J., Ahmad, N. N. R., Leo, C. P., Aberilla, J. M., Dela Cruz, I. J. Techno-economic and life cycle assessment of membrane separation in post-combustion carbon capture: A review. Gas Science and Engineering, 2024, 129, 205401.
[20] Li X, Peng Z, Pei Y, et al. Oxy‐fuel combustion for carbon capture and storage in internal combustion engines–A review[J]. Dean&Francis ISSN 2959-6157 International Journal of Energy Research, 2022, 46(2): 505-522.
[21] Asif M, Suleman M, Haq I, et al. Post‐combustion CO2 capture with chemical absorption and hybrid system: current status and challenges[J]. Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, 2018, 8(6): 998-1031.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 by the authors.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
