Sulfur Dioxide in the Atmosphere Dangers and Current Mitigation Strategies

Authors

  • Cui He

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61173/4stpdh93

Keywords:

fossil fuels, sulfur dioxide, SO₂ abatement

Abstract

Sulfur dioxide (SO₂), which is mainly produced by the combustion of fossil fuels, is one of the main causes of air quality deterioration on a global scale. Although its emissions have been significantly reduced in developed countries through the implementation of advanced desulfurization technologies and stringent environmental regulations, SO₂ emissions are still a major challenge in many developing countries. In this study, the CAS methodology was used to comprehensively analyze the major sources of SO₂, its hazards to human health and the environment, and the current management technologies and policies. It was found that the main sources of SO₂ include fossil fuel combustion, ore smelting, and other industrial processes. The environmental impacts of SO₂ include the generation of acid rain and the formation of fine particulate matter (PM2.5), while the direct impacts on human health include respiratory diseases and cardiovascular problems. Existing treatment technologies such as flue gas desulphurization (FGD) are effective in reducing emissions, but costs and technology applicability vary widely between countries. This paper also explores future directions for SO₂ management, including the need for technological innovation and policy adjustments. The findings are important for the development of more targeted and cost-effective global SO₂ reduction strategies.

References

[1] Sepehrian M, Anbia M, Hedayatzadeh M H, et al. SO2 drybased catalytic removal from flue gas leading to elemental sulfur production: A comprehensive review[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2023.

[2] Yazdanbakhsh F, Alizadehgiashi M, Bläsing M, et al. Cu–Cr–O Functionalized ETS-2 Nanoparticles for Hot Gas Desulfurization[J]. Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, 2016, 16(1): 878-884..

[3] Kumar L, Jana S K. Advances in absorbents and techniques used in wet and dry FGD: a critical review[J]. Reviews in Chemical Engineering, 2022, 38(7): 843-880.

[4] Strobel D F, Wolven B C. The atmosphere of Io: Abundances and sources of sulfur dioxide and atomic hydrogen[J]. Astrophysics and Space Science, 2001, 277: 271-287.

[5] Jonidi Jafari A, Charkhloo E, Pasalari H. Urban air pollution control policies and strategies: a systematic review[J]. Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering, 2021, 19: 1911- 1940.

[6] Dryukova E D, Nerobelov G M, Sedeeva M S, et al. Integration of Satellite Monitoring and Mathematical Modeling in Analyzing the Nature of Elevated Sulfur Dioxide Concentrations in the Surface Air of Northern Finland[J]. Izvestiya, Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics, 2023, 59(4): 390- 399.

[7] Zavala M, Molina L T, Yacovitch T I, et al. Emission factors of black carbon and co-pollutants from diesel vehicles in Mexico City[J]. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2017, 17(24): 15293-15305.

[8] Chen R, Huang W, Wong C M, et al. Short-term exposure to sulfur dioxide and daily mortality in 17 Chinese cities: the China air pollution and health effects study (CAPES)[J]. Environmental research, 2012, 118: 101-106.

[9] Chan H R, Chupp B A, Cropper M L, et al. The impact of trading on the costs and benefits of the Acid Rain Program[J]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2018, 88: 180-209.

[10] Zykov V N, Kurbatova A I, Chernyh N A, et al. Environmental Monitoring and Analysis on air pollution issue in China[J]. Advanced Materials Research, 2015, 1073: 588-591.

[11] Patzschke C. Amine functionalised metal-organic frameworks for carbon dioxide capture[D]. Monash University, 2014.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-31