Protocols of spinal cord stimulation: mechanisms, clinical outcomes, and indications
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61173/n9hysm62Keywords:
Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS), Tonic Stimulation, High-Frequency Stimulation, Burst StimulationAbstract
Several studies have shown that spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a very effective way to treat chronic pain when other treatments, such as medications and surgery, have not been effective. This study examines the mechanics, clinical results, and particular indications of the three main SCS protocols: burst, high-frequency, and tonic stimulation. Based on the gate control principle, tonic stimulation has been applied extensively but has several drawbacks, such as decreasing effectiveness with time. A superior treatment option for back and leg pain is high-frequency stimulation, which lessens discomfort without producing paresthesia. By modifying brain activity, especially in the anterior cingulate cortex, burst stimulation targets the affective components of pain and improves patients’ quality of life. Even with SCS’s advances, problems like tolerance and decreased long-term efficacy still exist. Closed-loop and data-driven intelligent SCS systems are among the future directions that will usher in a new era in chronic pain management by providing real-time modifications and individualized treatment programs.References
tems improve the effectiveness of neuromodulation ther- [4] Melzack, R., & Wall, P. D. (1965). Pain Mechanisms: A New apies for chronic pain by utilizing machine learning algo- Theory: A gate control system modulates sensory input from rithms, feedback loops, and real-time data analysis. These the skin before it evokes pain perception and response. Science, systems gather patient-specific data, such as neural activi- 150(3699), 971-979. ty patterns, and dynamically adjust stimulation parameters [5] Aryal, V., Poudel, S., Zulfiqar, F., Shrestha, T., Singh, to provide personalized and adaptive pain management. A., Shah, S. A., Soomro, U., Choudhari, J., Quinonez, J., By constantly tracking the patient’s response to the stimu- Ruxmohan, S., Amra, A., Albert, T., Kemmerlin, J., & Stein,
lation, intelligent SCS systems enhance the precision and J. (2021). Updates on the Role of Spinal Cord Stimulation in effectiveness of pain relief through continuous real-time the Management of Non-Surgical Chronic Lower Back Pain. adjustments [26]. Cureus, 13(10), e18928. [6] Song, J. J., Popescu, A., & Bell, R. L. (2014). Present and potential use of spinal cord stimulation to control chronic pain. Dean&Francis Jiajun Liu Pain physician, 17(3), 235. [17] Miller, J. P., Eldabe, S., Buchser, E., Johanek, L. M., [7] Joosten, E. A., & Franken, G. (2020). Spinal cord stimulation Guan, Y., & Linderoth, B. (2016). Parameters of spinal cord in chronic neuropathic pain: mechanisms of action, new stimulation and their role in electrical charge delivery: a review. locations, new paradigms. Pain, 161, S104-S113. Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface, 19(4), [8] Brill, S., Defrin, R., Aryeh, I. G., Zusman, A. M., & 373-384.
Benyamini, Y. (2022). Short‐and long‐term effects of [18] Ahmed, S., Yearwood, T., De Ridder, D., & Vanneste,
conventional spinal cord stimulation on chronic pain and health S. (2018). Burst and high frequency stimulation: underlying perceptions: A longitudinal controlled trial. European Journal of mechanism of action. Expert review of medical devices, 15(1), Pain, 26(9), 1849-1862. 61-70. [9] Provenzano, D., Tate, J., Gupta, M., Yu, C., Verrills, P., [19] Kapural, L., Yu, C., Doust, M. W., Gliner, B. E., Vallejo, R.,
Guirguis, M., ... & Bradley, K. (2022). Pulse dosing of 10-kHz Sitzman, B. T., ... & Burgher, A. H. (2015). Novel 10-kHz highparesthesia-independent spinal cord stimulation provides the frequency therapy (HF10 therapy) is superior to traditional lowsame efficacy with substantial reduction of device recharge time. frequency spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of chronic Pain Medicine, 23(1), 152-163. back and leg pain: the SENZA-RCT randomized controlled trial. [10] Linderoth, B., & Meyerson, B. A. (2010). Spinal cord Anesthesiology, 123(4), 851-860. stimulation: exploration of the physiological basis of a [20] De Ridder, D., Vanneste, S., Plazier, M., van der Loo, E.,
widely used therapy. The Journal of the American Society of & Menovsky, T. (2010). Burst spinal cord stimulation: toward Anesthesiologists, 113(6), 1265-1267. paresthesia-free pain suppression. Neurosurgery, 66(5), 986-990. [11] Kumar, K., North, R., Taylor, R., Sculpher, M., Van den [21] Meuwissen, K. P., de Vries, L. E., Gu, J. W., Zhang, T. C.,
Abeele, C., Gehring, M., ... & Jacobs, M. (2005). Spinal cord & Joosten, E. A. (2020). Burst and tonic spinal cord stimulation stimulation vs. conventional medical management: a prospective, both activate spinal GABAergic mechanisms to attenuate pain in randomized, controlled, multicenter study of patients with failed a rat model of chronic neuropathic pain. Pain Practice, 20(1), 75- back surgery syndrome (PROCESS study). Neuromodulation: 87. Technology at the Neural Interface, 8(4), 213-218. [22] Meuwissen, K. P., van der Toorn, A., Gu, J. W., Zhang, [12] Heijmans, L., & Joosten, E. A. (2020). Mechanisms and T. C., Dijkhuizen, R. M., & Joosten, E. A. (2020). Active mode of action of spinal cord stimulation in chronic neuropathic recharge burst and tonic spinal cord stimulation engage different pain. Postgraduate Medicine, 132(sup3), 17–21. supraspinal mechanisms: a functional magnetic resonance [13] Joosten, E. A., & Franken, G. (2020). Spinal cord imaging study in peripherally injured chronic neuropathic rats. stimulation in chronic neuropathic pain: mechanisms of action, Pain Practice, 20(5), 510-521.
new locations, new paradigms. Pain, 161 Suppl 1(1), S104– [23] Tafvizi, Pegah & Rattay, Frank. (2020). Electrical S113. Stimulation of the Spinal Cord to Decrease Pain [14] Laura Demartini, Gaetano Terranova, Massimo A. Elektrostimulation der Wirbelsäule zur Verringerung von Innamorato, Alessandro Dario, Michele Sofia, Carlo Angelini, Schmerzen. 10.34726/hss.2020.81363. Genni Duse, Amedeo Costantini, Matteo L.G. Leoni, [24] Falowski, S. M., Moore, G. A., Cornidez, E. G., Comparison of Tonic vs. Burst Spinal Cord Stimulation During Hutcheson, J. K., Candido, K., Peña, I., ... & Capobianco, R.
Trial Period, Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural A. (2021). Improved psychosocial and functional outcomes and
Interface, Volume 22, Issue 3,2019, Pages 327-332,ISSN reduced opioid usage following burst spinal cord stimulation. 1094-7159,https://doi.org/10.1111/ner.12867. Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface, 24(3), [15] Demartini L, Terranova G, Innamorato MA, Dario A, Sofia 581-590. M, Angelini C, Duse G, Costantini A, Leoni MLG. Comparison [25] Vallejo, R., Chakravarthy, K., Will, A., Trutnau, K., &
of Tonic vs. Burst Spinal Cord Stimulation During Trial Period. Dinsmoor, D. (2021). A New Direction for Closed-Loop Spinal Neuromodulation. 2019 Apr;22(3):327-332. doi: 10.1111/ Cord Stimulation: Combining Contemporary Therapy Paradigms ner.12867. Epub 2018 Oct 17. PMID: 30328646. with Evoked Compound Action Potential Sensing. Journal of [16] Kapural, L., Yu, C., Doust, M. W., Gliner, B. E., Vallejo, R., pain research, 14, 3909–3918.
Sitzman, B. T., ... & Burgher, A. H. (2015). Novel 10-kHz high- [26] Ivanov, D., Dolgui, A., Das, A., & Sokolov, B. (2019). frequency therapy (HF10 therapy) is superior to traditional low- Digital supply chain twins: Managing the ripple effect, resilience, frequency spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of chronic and disruption risks by data-driven optimization, simulation, and back and leg pain: the SENZA-RCT randomized controlled trial. visibility. Handbook of ripple effects in the supply chain, 309- Anesthesiology, 123(4), 851-860. 332.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 by the authors.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
