The Interplay Between Intuition and Rigor in Mathematical Problem Solving

Authors

  • Zixi Cynthia Wang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61173/rv80cy13

Keywords:

Intuition, rigor, Mathematical reasoning, Problem-solving, Philosophical Inquiry

Abstract

Intuition and rigor are two inevitable components in mathematical problem-solving. Traditionally, features of education in mathematics show that those two themes are seen to be mutually exclusive rather than complementary. The famous foundational debate between L.E.J Brouwer and David Hilbert shows that intuition and rigor are often seen as being at odds. The two characteristics of mathematics play a pivotal and dynamic role in education, reasoning problem-solving, and different applications of maths. This essay delves into the intricate relationship between these seemingly contrasting approaches, underscoring their significance in the evolution of mathematical development. The research employs a blend of historical analysis and philosophical inquiry to explore the roles of intuition and rigor and how they interact. The essay argues that while intuition often sparks the initial insights in mathematical discovery, it is the rigor that ensures the robustness and validity of these insights, leading to their acceptance within the mathematical community. Through case studies of renowned mathematicians and well-known problems, this research uncovers the symbiotic nature of intuition and rigor and is demonstrating how they collectively contribute to the richness of mathematical problem-solving. Those findings suggest that a balanced integration of both features is crucial for the integrity including consistency and completeness of mathematical knowledge.

References

[1] Barbeau, Edward J. Intuition and Rigour. University of Toronto, Department of Mathematics, 2002.

[2] Parsons, Charles. Mathematical Intuition. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 1979, 80: 145–168.

[3] HAMAMI Y. Mathematical rigor and proof. The Review of Symbolic Logic, 2022, 15(2): 409-449.

[4] Kreisel, Georg. Informal rigour and completeness proofs. Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics, 1967, 47: 138-186.

[5] Verburgt, Lukas, Kondrikova, Olga. On A.Ya. Khinchin‘s paper ‘Ideas of intuitionism and the struggle for a subject matter in contemporary mathematics’ (1926): A translation with introduction and commentary. Historia Mathematica, 2016, 43(4): 369-398.

[6] Smart, John Jamieson Carswell. Materialism. The Journal of Philosophy, 1963, 60(22): 651-662.

[7] Brouwer, L. E. Intuitionism and formalism. Bulletinamerican mathematical society, 2000, 37(1): 55-64.

[8] Hallett, M. Foundations of Mathematics. In Cambridge Histories Online, 2008.

[9] Foster, Colin. Resisting reductionism in mathematics pedagogy. The Curriculum Journal, 2013, 24(4): 563-585.

[10] Kadison, R. V. The Pythagorean theorem: I. The finite case. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2002, 99(7): 4178-4184.

[11] Heath, T. L. A History of Greek Mathematics: From Thales to Euclid. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1921.

[12] Seidenberg A. Did Euclid’s Elements, Book I, develop geometry axiomatically?. Archive for History of Exact Sciences, 1975: 263-295.

[13] Lantos F. Agrochemistry. Szegedi Tudományegyetem Mezőgazdasági Kar, Hódmezővásárhely, 2015, 228.

[14] Ferreiros, José. The crisis in the foundations of mathematics. ResearchGate, 2020.

[15] Lantos, F. From geometrical rigor to visual experience. Computers Math. Applic., 1989, 17(4-6): 931-953.

[16] Hallett M. Foundations of mathematics. In: Baldwin T, ed. The Cambridge History of Philosophy 1870–1945. Cambridge University Press, 2003: 128-156.

[17] Hall, David. Intuition and rigour: the role of visualization in the calculus. In: Zimmermann & Cunningham, ed. Visualization in Mathematics, M.A.A. Notes No. 19, 1991: 105–119.

[18] Kitcher, P. Mathematical Rigor--Who needs it? Noûs, 1981, 15(4): 469–493.

[19] Grabiner, J. V. Who Gave You the Epsilon? Cauchy and the Origins of Rigorous Calculus. The American Mathematical Monthly, 1983, 90(3): 185-194.

[20] Newton, I. The Mathematical Papers of Isaac Newton (Vol. 1-8). Cambridge University Press, 1999.

[21] Suwarto, S., Hidayah, I., Rochmad, R., Masrukan, M. Intuitive thinking: Perspectives on intuitive thinking processes in mathematical problem solving through a literature review. Cogent Education, 2023, 10(2).

Downloads

Published

2024-12-31

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 6 (2024): Volume 2, Issue 6

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2024 by the authors.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.