Analysis Three Approaches for Coping with Asteroid Impact: Impact of Aircraft, Nuclear Explosion, and Gravitational Traction

Authors

  • Feiyu Ren

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61173/6w0c5v35

Keywords:

Aircraft, Nuclear Explosion, Gravitational Traction

Abstract

The impact of an asteroid on the Earth may lead to catastrophic consequences, so it is necessary to explore effective approaches for protection. This paper aims to analyze the defense strategies against an asteroid impact on the Earth, focusing on three methods: impact of aircraft, nuclear explosion, and gravitational traction. This paper first outlines the basic characteristics of asteroids and their potential risk of impacting the Earth. Subsequently, it analyzes the status quo, advantages and disadvantages, and applicable conditions of the three defense methods. It is found that aircraft impact is mature but time-consuming. Nuclear explosions are fast and effective but carry political and radiation risks. Gravitational traction is safe and stable but takes a long time. Different approaches apply to different types of asteroids and warning times, and these factors need to be considered comprehensively when choosing. This paper then discusses the exploring directions for improvement of the various methods and points out possible future trends, including technology convergence and multinational cooperation. Finally, the importance of choosing the appropriate methods of defense based on the size of the asteroid and the warning time is emphasized.

References

This paper summarizes and analyzes the current research [1] Asteroids. Wikipedia, 2024. (Accessed: 30 August 2024). progress for these three asteroid defense methods and dis- [2] Wu W. Response to risk of near-earth asteroid impact.

cusses the advantages and disadvantages of each method. Chinese Journal of Engineering Science, 2022, 24(2): 140. The advantage of vehicle impact is that the technology is [3] Deacon E. L. The 1908 Tunguska Explosion. Weather, 1982, more mature and relevant experiments have been carried 37(6): 171–175. out. However, the disadvantage is that it takes a longer [4] Graf Th., et al. Exposure history of the Peekskill (H6)

time to design the mission program. The nuclear explo- meteorite. Meteoritics & Planetary Science, 1997, 32(1): 25–30. sion method is the most effective and fastest option, but [5] Drube L., Harris A. The NEOSHIELD project for near-earth Dean&Francis Feiyu Ren object impact threat mitigation. In: International Seminars on efficiency of the deflection of a dangerous space object using an

Nuclear War and Planetary Emergencies, 48th Session, 2016: explosion or impact. Technical Physics, 2015, 60(1): 26–30. 559–568. [11] Aleksandrova A. G. The preventive destruction of a [6] Drube L. Neoshield – a global approach to near-earth object hazardous asteroid. Astronomy Reports, 2016, 60(6): 611–619. impact threat mitigation. In: Handbook of Cosmic Hazards and [12] Han P. Numerical study on asteroid deflection by

Planetary Defense, 2014: 1–22. penetrating explosion based on single-material ALE method and [7] Cheng A. F., et al. Asteroid impact and deflection assessment FE-SPH adaptive method. Aerospace, 2023, 10(5): 479.

mission. Acta Astronautica, 2015, 115: 262–269. [13] Baum S. D. Risk–risk tradeoff analysis of nuclear [8] Cheng A. F., Agrusa H. F., Barbee B. W., et al. Momentum explosives for asteroid deflection. Risk Analysis, 2019, 39(11): transfer from the DART mission kinetic impact on asteroid 2427–2442.

Dimorphos. Nature, 2023, 616: 457–460. [14] Mazanek D. D., et al. Enhanced gravity tractor technique [9] Luo Y. Multisatellite task allocation and orbit planning for for planetary defense. NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS),

asteroid terminal defense. Aerospace, 2022, 9(7): 364.Rumpf 2015. C. M., et al. Deflection driven evolution of asteroid impact risk [15] Gao Y. A kinetic impact strategy for deflecting an asteroid

under large uncertainties. Acta Astronautica, 2020, 176: 276– to form a gravity tractor system with a potentially hazardous 286. asteroid. [10] Meshcheryakov S. A., Lipnitskii Yu. M. Estimated

Downloads

Published

2024-12-31