IPTW and DR Estimators: Advancing towards the Adoption of Methodologies for Estimating Causal Treatment Effects in Observational Studies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61173/07cxwz28Keywords:
Average treatment effect, inverse probability of treatment weighting, doubly robust, causal inferenceAbstract
The propensity score refers to the likelihood of a subject being selected for intervention, given their observed baseline covariates. By assigning different weights to academic disciplines based on the reciprocal probability of receiving treatment, there will be a synthetic sample where the assignment of treatment is not influenced by baseline factors that were measured. Utilizing inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) through the propensity score enables people to assemble unbiased or objective estimates regarding average treatment effects. In order to estimate the causal relationship between an exposure and an outcome, the second notion of doubly robust estimation combines an outcome regression with a propensity score model. Only when the statistical model is appropriately stated can unbiased estimates be obtained using the propensity score approach and outcome regression separately. However, even if only one of the two models is correctly specified, an unbiased estimator for the effect can be obtained by employing the doubly robust estimator. This introduction to inverse probability of treatment weighting and doubly robust estimators includes conceptual overviews, an application to students’ performance in high school, as well as discussions based on the project.
References
[1] Sekhon J. The Neyman-Rubin Model of Causal Inference and Estimation via Matching Methods. The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.
[2] Rosenbaum P R, Rubin D B. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 1983, 70: 41-55.
[3] Rosenbaum P R, Rubin D B. Reducing bias in observational studies using subclassification on the propensity score. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1984, 79: 516-524.
[4] Austin P C. An introduction to propensity-score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 2011, 46: 399-424.
[5] Rosenbaum P R. Model-based direct adjustment. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1987, 82: 387-394.
[6] Rubin D B. Using propensity scores to help design observational studies: application to the tobacco litigation. Health Services & Outcomes Research Methodology, 2001, 2: 169-188.
[7] Rubin D B. Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1974, 66: 688-701.
[8] Imbens G W. Nonparametric estimation of average treatment effects under exogeneity: a review. Review of Economics and Statistics, 2004, 86: 4-29.
[9] Michele Jonsson Funk, Daniel Westreich, et al. Doubly Robust Estimation of Causal Effects, American Journal of Epidemiology, 2011, 761-767.
[10] Emsley R, Lunt M, Pickles A, Dunn G. Implementing Double-robust Estimators of Causal Effects. The Stata Journal, 2008, 8(3): 334-353.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 by the authors.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
