Solving the Small Disturbance Equation and Numerical Method Optimization in Subsonic and Supersonic Flows
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61173/1es0dw64Keywords:
Small disturbance equation, subsonic flow, successive over-relaxation;, computational fluid dynamicsAbstract
This paper addresses the solution of the Small Disturbance Equation (SDE) under subsonic and supersonic flow conditions using Successive Over-Relaxation (SOR) techniques. The study implements and validates numerical methods tailored to the unique dynamics of these regimes by setting precise boundary conditions, adjusting computational stencils, and managing the Mach number ( M∞ ) across the solution domain. A detailed comparison of streamline patterns between the regimes illustrates the efficacy of the applied numerical strategies. In the subsonic domain, the flow demonstrates uniform and smooth characteristics, conducive to standard SOR techniques, as evidenced by the rapid decline in residual errors, confirming the method’s efficiency for accurate solutions. Conversely, the supersonic regime presents increased complexity where standard finite difference methods encounter notable challenges, necessitating more sophisticated approaches to capture the intricate flow behaviors effectively. Conversely, in the supersonic regime, where the flow behavior exhibits more complex characteristics, the standard finite difference method faces challenges.
References
it is important to acknowledge its limitations. The meth- [1] Allahviranloo T. Successive over relaxation iterative method od’s performance is highly dependent on the choice of the for fuzzy system of linear equations. Applied Mathematics and relaxation factor ( ω ), and finding the optimal value can Computation, 2005, 162(1): 189-196. be challenging, particularly in complex flow regimes. Ad- [2] Kryeziu O., Johnson E. Subsonic to supersonic nozzle flows. ditionally, while the method performed well in the cases SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, 2013, 73: 175-194. studied, its applicability to more complex three-dimen- https://doi.org/10.1137/110845434 sional flows or flows with more intricate boundary condi- [3] Li X. Research on 2D SDE method of fluid field effect above tions remains to be fully explored. Future research could airfoil at transonic speed. Highlights in Science, Engineering and focus on extending the SOR method to three-dimensional Technology, 2023, 76: 254-260. flows, where the added complexity may require further [4] Qian X. The impact of inlet Mach number and domain shape
on subsonic nozzle flow via small disturbance equation. Journal [8] Shan S., Chen W., Chen Z. A survey of application of Physics: Conference Series, 2023, 2441(1): 012002. https:// and development of small disturbance equation method in doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/ 2441/1/012002 the aviation area. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, [5] Zhu Xianxun, Huang Yao, Wang Xiangyang, Wang Rui. 2021, 2012(1): 012025. https://doi.org/10.1088/ 1742- Emotion recognition based on brain-like multimodal hierarchical 6596/2012/1/012025 perception. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 2024, 83(18): [9] Cheng Fanrui, Yang Xu, Zhou Wenbo. Nozzle flow 56039-56057. simulation by small disturbance approximation and Euler [6] Rom J. High angle of attack aerodynamics: subsonic, method. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2021, 2012(1): transonic, and supersonic flows. Springer Science & Business 012025. Media, 2012. [10] Li Zhaorui, Jaberi Farhad A. A high-order finite difference [7] Rozov V., Winter M., Breitsamter C. Antisymmetric method for numerical simulations of supersonic turbulent flows. boundary condition for small disturbance CFD. Journal of Fluids International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 2012, and Structures, 2019, 85: 229-248. 68(6): 740-766.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 by the authors.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
