Research and Analysis of the Small Disturbance Equation in Subsonic, Transonic, and Supersonic Regimes

Authors

  • Jinglun Li

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61173/02vmsx61

Keywords:

Computational fluid dynamics, Small disturbance equations

Abstract

This paper explores the application of the Small Disturbance Equation (SDE) across subsonic, transonic, and supersonic flow regimes. Derived from the Euler and Navier-Stokes equations, the SDE offers an efficient framework for analyzing aerodynamic behaviors, particularly through the utilization of discretization techniques and iterative solving methods executed in Python. The study assesses the accuracy and limitations of the SDE in detailing essential flow characteristics, revealing that while the equation performs effectively in subsonic and transonic flows, it encounters challenges in supersonic regimes. Nonlinear effects such as shock waves significantly hinder its performance at high speeds. Compared with conventional computational fluid dynamics (CFD) methods, the SDE stands out in scenarios where computational efficiency is paramount. However, its limitations in handling high-speed flows must be carefully considered, highlighting the need for further refinement in its application to supersonic dynamics. This analysis suggests that while the SDE is beneficial for certain aerodynamic studies, its scope and utility are constrained by the inherent complexities of high-speed fluid dynamics.

References

[1] Qian Xiang. The impact of inlet Mach number and domain shape on the subsonic nozzle flow via small disturbance equation. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2023, 2441(1).

[2] Hu Kun. Simulation of flow field above airfoil under transonic speeds, based on small disturbance equation. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2023, 2441(1).

[3] Fang Rong. Influence of the inlet Mach number and size of its throat on the symmetrical nozzle flow by small disturbance equation method. Proceedings of SPIE, 2022, 12259.

[4] Sharma Nikhil. Pressure disturbance upstream of BLDS housing configurations: An experimental study. Cal Poly Wind Tunnel Experiments, 2018, Private Communication.

[5] Zhu Xianxun, Xu Hongxuan, Zhao Zhiyang, Wang Xu, Wei Xiong, Zhang Yang, & Zuo Jiancun. An environmental intrusion detection technology based on WiFi. Wireless Personal Communications, 2021, 119(2): 1425-1436.

[6] Smith John. The use of asymptotic methods in high Reynolds-number flows. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2022..

[7] Chen Xiang, Cheng Xiang, & Tian Jun. Research on the pressure distribution under different airfoil types of aircraft. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2023, 2441(1).

[8] Brooks Thomas F., Pope David S., & Marcolini Michael A. Airfoil self-noise and prediction. NASA Reference Publication, 1989.

[9] Anderson William K., & Batina John T. Accurate solutions, parameter studies, and comparisons for the Euler and potential flow equations. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Langley Research Center, 1988.

[10] Muñoz Álvaro, & García-Fogeda Pablo. Active Flutter Suppression of a Wing Section in the Subsonic, Sonic and Supersonic Regimes by the H∞ Control Method. Aerospace, 2024, 11(3): 198.

Downloads

Published

2024-10-29