Optimization and Analysis of Flow Field Simulations Across Different Mach Regimes Using Discrete Numerical Methods
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61173/wcb3cx83Keywords:
CFD, Potential Equation, Stable FlowAbstract
This article explores the development of flow field models in steady-state environments utilizing Euler equations and potential flow equations, with verification processes conducted using Python. The models demonstrate stability and high accuracy in low-velocity scenarios, capturing essential dynamics effectively. However, as the conditions transition to supersonic speeds, the models begin to exhibit increased errors. This discrepancy highlights the challenges faced in simulating high-speed aerodynamics accurately. The research underscores the importance of improving model fidelity in diverse Mach regimes, particularly in supersonic conditions where traditional methods struggle. Future research directions identified include the development of unsteady flow field models, which are crucial for dynamic analyses, optimization of grid structures for three-dimensional complex fields to improve computational efficiency, and the creation of extensive model libraries. These advancements aim to enhance the accuracy, reliability, and practicality of flow field simulations, extending their applicability in both academic studies and industry applications, particularly in aerospace engineering where precise flow modeling is critical.
References
[1] Núñez Marc, López Iñigo, Baiges Joan, & Rossi Riccardo. An embedded approach for the solution of the full potential equation with finite elements. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2022, 388: 114244.
[2] Wang Xiaojia, & Christov Ivan C. Reduced models of unidirectional flows in compliant rectangular ducts at finite Reynolds number. Physics of Fluids, 2021, 33(10): 102004.
[3] El-Emam M. A., Zhou L., Shi W., et al. Theories and applications of CFD–DEM coupling approach for granular flow: A review. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 2021, 1-42.
[4] Girfoglio M., Quaini A., & Rozza G. A POD-Galerkin reduced order model for the Navier–Stokes equations in stream function-vorticity formulation. Computers & Fluids, 2022, 244: 105536.
[5] Africa P. C., Fumagalli I., Bucelli M., et al. lifex-cfd: An open-source computational fluid dynamics solver for cardiovascular applications. Computer Physics Communications, 2024, 296: 109039.
[6] Zong Q., & Wu X. A review of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) methodology and analysis on airflow and sand transport over aeolian landforms. Catena, 2024, 241: 108010.
[7] Cheng Xiaoxun, Zhao Ling, Ge Yongjun, et al. Full-Scale/ Model Test Comparisons to Validate the Traditional Atmospheric Boundary Layer Wind Tunnel Tests: Literature Review and Personal Perspectives. Applied Sciences, 2024, 14(2): 782.
[8] Khalil Essam E. CFD history and applications. 2021.
[9] Liu Ming, Li Xiaoyan, & Zhao Qian. Exact solutions to Euler equation and Navier–Stokes equation. Zeitschrift für angewandte Mathematik und Physik, 2019, 70: 1-13.
[10] Holst Thomas L. Numerical computation of transonic flow governed by the full-potential equation. 1983, 24-26.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 by the authors.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
