The Investigation of Artificial Intelligence in Cultural Relics Protection
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61173/hhpeyy15Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, deep learning, cultural relics protectionAbstract
It is well-known that the importance of cultural heritage in history, culture, art and other aspects is self-evident. However, due to various force majeure damage, the situation of cultural heritage protection is becoming more and more severe. This article will review and look forward to the application of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in cultural relics protection. The method section of this paper demonstrates various AI technologies such as Generative Adversarial Networks (GAN), deep learning, and reinforcement learning, and applies them to cultural relic digitization, damage detection, virtual restoration, and cultural heritage management and display. The next section outlines the specific tasks for which these AI techniques are applicable, demonstrating the potential of these innovations to improve accuracy and efficiency in work. In the subsequent discussion section, the current limitations and challenges of AI in this field are analyzed, such as data dependency and “black box” characteristics. At the same time, the future direction of AI is discussed, such as interpretable AI (XAI) and adaptive learning. Finally, this paper concludes that although AI has challenges, it will play an increasingly important role in the field of cultural heritage protection in the future.
References
[1] Pan S, Zhang J, Wang L, et al. A review of generative adversarial networks in cultural heritage. Herit Sci. 2019; 7:40.
[2] Pavlidis G, Koutsoudis A, Arnaoutoglou F, Tsioukas V, Chamzas C. Methods for 3D digitization of cultural heritage. J Cult Herit. 2007;8(1):93-8.
[3] Jin Y, Wang H, Li X, Zhang Q. Application of Generative Adversarial Networks in the Virtual Restoration of Cultural Heritage. J Cult Herit Preserv. 2020;45(3):123-34.
[4] Li Z, Fang S, Wang J, Yuan F. Automatic crack detection and analysis for cultural heritage using deep learning and image processing. J Cult Herit. 2020; 43:34-45.
[5] Masiero S, Grinzato E, Marinetti S, Bison P, Volinia A. Application of thermography and AI for cultural heritage damage detection. Infrared Phys Technol. 2020; 102:103070.
[6] Roussou M, Drettakis G. AI-driven virtual museums: Enhancing cultural heritage through immersive technologies. Comput Graph. 2019; 85:1-13.
[7] Mendoza E, Barreiro A, Ortega J. AI applications in the management and digital preservation of cultural heritage databases. Digit Appl Archaeol Cult Herit. 2020;16.
[8] Ghosh A, Kandasamy D. Interpretable artificial intelligence: why and when. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2020 May;214(5):1137-8.
[9] Linardatos P, Papastefanopoulos V, Kotsiantis S. Explainable ai: A review of machine learning interpretability methods. Entropy. 2020 Dec 25;23(1):18.
[10] Farahani A, Voghoei S, Rasheed K, Arabnia HR. A brief review of domain adaptation. Advances in data science and information engineering: proceedings from ICDATA 2020 and IKE 2020. 2021:877-94.
[11] Ben-David S, Blitzer J, Crammer K, Pereira F. Analysis of representations for domain adaptation. Advances in neural information processing systems. 2006;19.
[12] Li Y. Deep reinforcement learning: An overview. arXiv preprint arXiv:1701.07274. 2017 Jan 25.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 by the authors.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
