BCI for Exoskeletons and Prostheses from Rehabilitation to Human Enhancement
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61173/3qem7h84Keywords:
-brain computer interface (BCI), human augmentation, rehabilitation, exoskeleton, prostheticsAbstract
Brain-computer interface (BCI) technology has revolutionized the development of motor rehabilitation and body enhancement. However, a significant gap exists between the limited use of BCI for exoskeletons and prosthetics in healthy individuals and its wide application in motor-impaired patients. This literature review aims to bridge that gap and highlight the potential of BCI technology for future applications in body enhancement for healthy individuals. We review the literature across neuroscience, biomedical engineering, and robotics, focusing on BCI applications in prosthetics and exoskeletons for both motor-impaired and healthy individuals. We summarize the methods for adapting and transferring prosthetic structures designed for individuals with disabilities to healthy individuals and identify the most suitable model for the healthy population. Our findings highlight the transformative potential of BCI technology to significantly enhance human capabilities, inspire innovation in assistive devices, and improve productivity and quality of life.
References
[1] R. Xu, N. Jiang, N. Mrachacz-Kersting, C. Lin, G. A. Prieto, J. C. Moreno, J. L. Pons, K. Dremstrup, and D. Farina, “ A closedloop brain–computer interface triggering an active ankle–foot orthosis for inducing cortical neural plasticity,” 2014.
[2] M. Ortiz, L. Ferrero, E. I´a˜nez, J. M. Azor´ın, and J. L. Contreras-Vidal, “Sensory integration in human movement: A new brain-machine interface based on gamma band and attention level for controlling a lower-limb exoskeleton.” 2020, 735-735.
[3] L. Minati, N. Yoshimura, and Y. Koike, “Hybrid control of a vision-guided robot arm by eog, emg, eeg biosignals and head movement acquired via a consumer-grade wearable device,” Ieee Access, vol. 4, pp. 9528–9541, 2016.
[4] E. Buch, C. Weber, L. G. Cohen, C. Braun, M. A. Dimyan, T. Ard, J. Mellinger, A. Caria, S. Soekadar, A. Fourkas et al., “Think to move: a neuromagnetic brain-computer interface (bci) system for chronic stroke,” Stroke, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 910-917, Mar. Dean&Francis 2008.
[5] Z. Li, Y. Yuan, L. Luo, W. Su, K. Zhao, C. Xu, J. Huang, and M. Pi, “Hybrid brain/muscle signals powered wearable walking exoskeleton enhancing motor ability in climbing stairs activity,” IEEE Trans. Med. Robotics Bionics, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 218-227, Nov. 2019.
[6] H. Gao, L. Luo, M. Pi, Z. Li, Q. Li, K. Zhao, and J. Huang, “Eeg-based volitional control of prosthetic legs for walking in different terrains,” 2021.
[7] G. Salvietti, I. Hussain, D. Cioncoloni, S. Taddei, S. Rossi, and D. Prattichizzo, “Compensating hand function in chronic stroke patients through the robotic sixth finger,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 142–150, 2016.
[8] J. Zhang, B. Wang, C. Zhang, Y. Xiao, and M. Y. Wang, “An eeg/emg/eog-based multimodal human-machine interface to realtime control of a soft robot hand,” Frontiers in neurorobotics, vol. 13, p. 7, 2019.
[9] Q. Gao, L. Dou, A. N. Belkacem, and C. Chen, “Noninvasive electroencephalogram based control of a robotic arm for writing task using hybrid bci system,” BioMed research international, vol. 2017, no. 1, p. 8316485, 2017.
[10] S. Park, J. Ha, D.-H. Kim, and L. Kim, “Improving motor imagery-based brain-computer interface performance based on sensory stimulation training: an approach focused on poorly performing users,” Frontiers in Neuroscience, vol. 15, p. 732545, 2021.
[11] E. Tidoni, P. Gergondet, G. Fusco, A. Kheddar, and S. M. Aglioti, “The role of audio-visual feedback in a thought-based control of a humanoid robot: a bci study in healthy and spinal cord injured people,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 772–781, 2016.
[12] C. I. Penaloza and S. Nishio, “Bmi control of a third arm for multitasking,” Science Robotics, vol. 3, no. 20, p. eaat1228, 2018.
[13] Y. Liu, S. Huang, Z. Wang, F. Ji, and D. Ming, “A novel modular and wearable supernumerary robotic finger via eeg-emg control with 4-week training assessment,” in Intelligent Robotics and Applications: 14th International Conference, ICIRA 2021, Yantai, China, October 22–25, 2021, Proceedings, Part I 14. Springer, 2021, pp. 748–758.
[14] B. Yun, “Research on Continuous Control Technology for Lower Limb Exoskeleton based on Motor Imagery Decoding and Online Gait Planning,” Master’s thesis, Dept. Brain-Computer Interface, Hangzhou Dianzi Univ., Hangzhou, China, 2023. [Online]. Available: DOI:10.27075/d.cnki.ghzdc.2023.001237.
[15] C. He, “Anthropomorphic motion generation principle and human-robot interaction control research for humanoid upper limb rehabilitation robots,” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. Mechatronic Eng., Huazhong Univ. of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China, 2022. [Online]. Available: DOI:10.27157/d.cnki. ghzku.2022.006326.
[16] W. Wang, Y. Liu, Z. Li, Z. Wang, F. He, D. Ming, and D. Yang, “Building multi-modal sensory feedback pathways for srl with the aim of sensory enhancement via bci,” Proc. 2019 IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO), 2019, pp. 2439–2444.
[17] T. Suhail and A. Vinod, “An online neurofeedback game using consumer-grade eeg for improving attention and memory skills,” Proc. 2024 9th Int. Conf. Intelligent Information Technology, 2024, pp. 487–492.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 by the authors.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
