Deep Learning for Accurate, Efficient, Economical, and ConsistentCancer Diagnosis Compared to Traditional Biopsy

Authors

  • Jiahong Lin

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61173/et1nrh25

Keywords:

Deep Learning, Efficient, Economical, Consistent Cancer Diagnosis

Abstract

Early and precise cancer diagnosis is essential for enhancing the effectiveness of treatments. Traditional biopsy techniques, while reliable, are often time-consuming and economically inefficient. Furthermore, variations in diagnostic assessments among physicians introduce additional uncertainty in outcomes. This paper investigates the application of machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) methods to improve diagnostic accuracy and efficiency. It evaluates the advantages and disadvantages of feature-based versus image-based diagnostic approaches and introduces a new diagnostic workflow named AIStain. This workflow encompasses two pathways: one involving feature extraction followed by classical machine learning techniques, and the other using convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for deep learning analysis. Our analysis demonstrates that integrating machine learning can significantly enhance diagnostic speed, reduce costs, and improve consistency across evaluations without compromising accuracy. By leveraging advanced computational techniques, this approach aims to standardize cancer diagnostics and reduce the dependency on subjective human evaluation, potentially transforming cancer diagnosis practices.

References

[1] Brouwer, NPM & Lord, Amy & Terlizzo, M & Bateman, AC & West, Nicholas & Goldin, R & Martinez, A & Wong, Newton & Novelli, Marco & Nagtegaal, Iris & Brown, Gina. (2021). Interobserver variation in the classification of tumor deposits in rectal cancer – is the use of histopathological characteristics the way to go?. Virchows Archiv. 479. 10.1007/s00428-021-03197- 0.

[2] Chowdhury, Nilotpal et al. “Interobserver variation in breast cancer grading: a statistical modeling approach.” Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology vol. 28,4 (2006): 213-8.

[3] Kumar, Rajesh et al. “Detection and Classification of Cancer from Microscopic Biopsy Images Using Clinically Significant and Biologically Interpretable Features.” Journal of Medical Engineering vol. 2015 (2015): 457906. doi:10.1155/2015/457906

[4] Latonen, Leena, et al. “Virtual Staining for Histology by Deep Learning.” Trends in Biotechnology, Elsevier BV, Mar. 2024. Crossref, doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2024.02.009.

[5] Raab SS, Grzybicki DM, Janosky JE, Zarbo RJ, Meier FA, Dean&Francis Jensen C, Geyer SJ. Clinical impact and frequency of anatomic pathology errors in cancer diagnoses. Cancer. 2005 Nov 15;104(10):2205-13. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21431. PMID: 16216029.

[6] Street, Nick & Wolberg, William & Mangasarian, O. (1999). Nuclear Feature Extraction For Breast Tumor Diagnosis. Proc. Soc. Photo-Opt. Inst. Eng.. 1993. 10.1117/12.148698

[7] Faust, O., Acharya, U. R., Meiburger, K. M., Molinari, F., Koh, J. E., Yeong, C. H., ... & Ng, K. H. (2018). Comparative assessment of texture features for the identification of cancer in ultrasound images: a review. Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering, 38(2), 275-296.

[8] Zhu, X., Xu, H., Zhao, Z., & others. (2021). An Environmental Intrusion Detection Technology Based on WiFi. Wireless Personal Communications, 119(2), 1425-1436.

[9] Bhatt, H., Shah, V., Shah, K., Shah, R., & Shah, M. (2023). State-of-the-art machine learning techniques for melanoma skin cancer detection and classification: A comprehensive review. Intelligent Medicine, 3(03), 180-190.

[10] Javeed, A., Khan, S. U., Ali, L., Ali, S., Imrana, Y., & Rahman, A. (2022). Machine learning-based automated diagnostic systems developed for heart failure prediction using different types of data modalities: A systematic review and future directions. Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine, 2022.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-06