Research on Diabetes Prediction Based on Machine Learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61173/a8wgtn61Keywords:
Diabetes Prediction, Machine Learning, Data Collection and Feature ProcessingAbstract
Diabetes is a serious chronic disease and successful prediction can effectively improve early intervention and subsequent treatment. Nowadays, machine learning technology is gradually attracting people’s attention in diabetes prediction. However, previous research is relatively limited for now. This review systematically and comprehensively reviews the current status of diabetes prediction, the application of machine learning in this field, and the current challenges faced by machine learning. First, the epidemiological characteristics of diabetes and the background of the rise of machine learning in the medical field are introduced. Secondly, the latest progress and typical cases of machine learning technology in diabetes prediction are discussed. Subsequently, the methods and challenges of data collection and feature processing are discussed in detail, as well as commonly used machine learning models and their evaluation methods. We will further comprehensively analyze the main findings and results of existing research, evaluate the application effect of machine learning in diabetes prediction, and look forward to future research directions and development trends. This review will provide researchers with a comprehensive guide to the latest advances and methods of machine learning in diabetes prediction and promote further research and applications in related fields.
References
[1] Scobie I N, Samaras K. Fast facts: Diabetes mellitus. Karger Medical and Scientific Publishers, 2014.
[2] Gale E A M, Gillespie K M. Diabetes and gender. Diabetologia, 2001, 44: 3-15.
[3] Huang, Y., Cai, X., Mai, W., Li, M., & Hu, Y. (2016). Association between prediabetes and risk of cardiovascular disease and all cause mortality: systematic review and metaanalysis. Bmj, 355.
[4] Bommer, C., Sagalova, V., Heesemann, E., Manne-Goehler, J., Atun, R., Bärnighausen, T., ... & Vollmer, S. (2018). Global economic burden of diabetes in adults: projections from 2015 to 2030. Diabetes care, 41(5), 963-970.
[5] Wang Y., Lin R., Yan Y., & Li H. (2024). Study on subgroup classification of diabetes patients with mild cognitive impairment. Journal of Nursing (04), 45-48.
[6] Sattar, N., Rawshani, A., Franzén, S., Rawshani, A., Svensson, A. M., Rosengren, A., ... & Gudbjörnsdottir, S. (2019). Age at diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus and associations with cardiovascular and mortality risks: findings from the Swedish National Diabetes Registry. Circulation, 139(19), 2228- 2237.
[7] Rajkomar, A., Dean, J., & Kohane, I. (2019). Machine learning in medicine. New England Journal of Medicine, 380(14), 1347-1358.
[8] Miotto, R., Li, L., Kidd, B. A., & Dudley, J. T. (2016). Deep patient: an unsupervised representation to predict the future of patients from the electronic health records. Scientific reports, 6(1), 1-10.
[9] Wang C., Sun Q., Chen W., &Li G. (2024). Using XGBoost Integrated Tree Model as the Health Assessment Model of Railway IT Infrastructure. Internet Weekly (05), 28-30.
[10] LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015). Deep learning. nature, 521(7553), 436-444.
[11] Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., ... & Polosukhin, I. (2017). Attention is all you need. Advances in neural information processing systems, 30.
[12] Sokolova, M., & Lapalme, G. (2009). A systematic analysis of performance measures for classification tasks. Information processing & management, 45(4), 427-437.
[13] Varma, S., & Simon, R. (2006). Bias in error estimation when using cross-validation for model selection. BMC bioinformatics, 7, 1-8.
[14] Lundberg, S. M., & Lee, S. I. (2017). A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. Advances in neural information processing systems, 30.
[15] Ribeiro, M. T., Singh, S., & Guestrin, C. (2016, August). “ Why should i trust you?” Explaining the predictions of any classifier. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining (pp. 1135-1144).
[16] Kitchenham, B. A., Budgen, D., & Brereton, O. P. (2011). Using mapping studies as the basis for further research– a participant-observer case study. Information and Software Technology, 53(6), 638-651.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 by the authors.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
