Optimal production with carbon trading market in China
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61173/xc0gy113Keywords:
optimal production model, carbon quota, emission permits and tradingAbstract
As a significant carbon dioxide-emitting country globally, China has set a concrete short-term target of carbon dioxide
emissions peak in 2030 and an ambitious long-term plan to reach carbon neutrality by 2060. One essential policy is to
set up a carbon trading market to reduce high-pollution enterprises’ carbon emissions by rationally allocating carbon
quotas among different firms and regions and setting carbon quotas trading market.
In reality, firms obtain carbon quotas in three ways, initial allocation from the government, carbon market trading, and
purification. By using carbon quotas, firms are required to meet the limitation of carbon emissions by regulations. To
help firms make the cost-optimal decision in both short-term and long-term management, this paper focuses on the
impact and trading of carbon quota for emission-depending firms.
The short-term optimal production model suits firms less than a year from meeting emission limitation requirements. It
is considered that during this time, firms cannot upgrade production equipment with less carbon emission but can only
sell or buy carbon quotas in the carbon trading market. Furthermore, this paper builds a carbon quota price predicting
model based on the long-short-term memory neural networks(LSTM) method to help firms develop a better trading
strategy. In the long term, firms can update their technique to less carbon-emitting production technology. Therefore,
a long-term optimal production model is established, and variable purifying levels are discussed. Finally, this paper
calculates the optimal production strategy under different restraints of carbon emission.
References
[1] Pigou, Arthur Cecil. The economics of welfare[M]. Transaction Publishers, 1924.
[2] Hardin, Garrett. The tragedy of the commons [J]. Science, 1968, 162(3859): 1243-1248.
[3] Tomás R A F, Ribeiro FR, Santos V M S, et al. Assessment of the impact of the European CO2 emissions trading scheme on the Portuguese chemical industry[J]. Energy Policy, 2009,38(1):626-
[4] Demailly D, Quirion P. European Emission Trading Scheme and Competitiveness: A case study on the iron and steel industry ☆ [J]. Energy Economics, 2008, 30(4):2009-2027.
[5] Asselt H V, Biermann F. European emissions trading and the international competitiveness of energy-intensive industries: a legal and political evaluation of possible supporting measures[J]. Energy Policy, 2007, 35(1):497-506.
[6] Chan H S, Li S, Zhang F. Firm competitiveness and the European Union emissions trading scheme ☆ [J]. Energy Policy, 2013, 63(6):1056-1064.
[7] Lee M. Potential cost savings from internal/external CO2 emissions trading in the Korean electric power industry[J]. Energy Policy, 2011, 39(10):6162-6167
[8] Kara, M., Syri, S., Lehtila, A., Helynen, S., Kekkonen, V., Ruska, M., Forsstrom, J. The impacts of EM CO2 emission trading on electricity markets and electricity consumers in Finland[J]. Energy Economics, 2008, 30(2): 193-211.
[9] Barbot C, Betancor O, Socorro M P, et al. Trade-offs between environmental regulation and market competition: Airlines, emission trading systems, and entry deterrence[J]. Transport Policy, 2012, 33(33):65-72.
[10] Robin Smale, Murray Hartley, Cameron Hepburn, et al. The impact of emissions trading on firm profits and market prices[J]. Climate Policy, 2006, 6(1):31-48.
[11] Zhang B, Xu L. Multi-item production planning with carbon cap and trade mechanism[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2013, 144(1):118-127
[12] https://www.cneeex.com/ Dean&Francis
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 by the authors.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
