Fundamentals, Challenges, and Improved Algorithms of PID Control for Quadrotor UAVs

Authors

  • Liying Sheng

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61173/87y22445

Keywords:

Quadrotor UAV, PID control, Fuzzy adaptive PID, Deep reinforcement learning, Flight control

Abstract

The quadrotor unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) are widely employed in power line inspections, agricultural monitoring, cargo delivery, and surveying operations because of their straightforward design and remarkable agility. However, traditional proportional-integralderivative (PID) controllers perform poorly under wind, load changes, and sensor noise, which limits the UAV’s precision and flight reliability. Thus, this paper reviews the current development of PID control for quadcopter UAVs, examines the limitations of traditional PID controllers, and compares the performance and applications of various improved algorithms, offering guidance for controller selection and parameter tuning. By analyzing relevant literature on improvement strategies, such as fuzzy adaptive PID, evolutionary learning-optimized PID, data-driven adaptive PID, deep reinforcement learning PID (DRL-PID), and hybrid model PID, and integrating existing simulation and experimental data, key performance indicators such as stability, speed, disturbance rejection, and computational load are summarized. The results show that data-driven PID like DRL-PID achieves the highest accuracy, while fuzzy adaptive PID remains widely used in engineering for its low computational load and real-time performance. Each algorithm has its strengths in different applications: fuzzy adaptive PID is suitable for real-time tasks, RL-GA and hybrid models are suitable for high-precision mapping, and WRLS adaptive PID is suitable for logistics with frequently changing loads. Meanwhile, lightweight DRLPID and multi-UAV cooperative control are promising future directions.  

References

quadrotor UAVs, covering the fundamentals, challenges, Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2024, 60(3): 2456-2468. and various improved algorithms. In particular, traditional [2] Yu W. Y., Yang K. L. Modeling and Fuzzy PID Control of

fixed-gain PID controllers have been validated to perform Quadrotor UAVs. ISA Transactions, 2019, 94: 231-242. adequately in low-disturbance scenarios, such as indoor [3] Trinh L. M., Tu T. N. Altitude Control of 6-DOF

hovering, where they achieve an altitude overshoot of Quadcopters. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2024, 146: around 20%, near-zero steady-state error, and response 108987. times of approximately 1 s. However, under complex en- [4] Cedro L., Szczęsniak A. Adaptive PID for Quadrotor Payload

vironmental conditions including wind speeds exceeding Variations. Control Engineering Practice, 2024, 143: 105678. 5 m/s, load fluctuations of ±10%, and IMU noise with [5] Cedro L., Wieczorkowski K., Szczęsniak A. An Adaptive standard deviations of 0.1°/s, traditional PID exhibits sig- PID Control System for the Attitude and Altitude Control of a

nificant performance degradation with overshoot exceed- Quadcopter. Acta Mechanica et Automatica, 2024, 18(1): 29-39. ing 25% and steady-state error rising above 10%. [6] Zhang-jian, ZHANG Fan, ZHU Zheng-hou, YUAN Zhi- Dean&Francis Liying Sheng

fen, WANG Wen-zhi. Modeling and Fuzzy PID Control of a Systems, 2022, 106(4): 68. Quadcopter. Journal of Nanchang Hangkong University: Natural [10] Hosseinkhani M., Ramezanlou M. T. RL-GA Optimized

Sciences, 2024, 38(2): 39-48. PID for UAVs. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, 2025, [7] Melo A. G., Andrade F. A. A., Guedes I. P. Fuzzy Gain- 114(2): 35. Scheduling PID for UAV Position and Altitude Controllers. [11] Dong J., He B. Novel Fuzzy PID-Type Iterative Learning

Sensors, 2022, 22(6): 2173. Control for Quadrotor UAV. IEEE Access, 2019, 7: 169646- [8] Muliadi J., Kusumoputro B. Neural Network Control System 169656. of UAV Altitude Dynamics and Its Comparison with the PID [12] Khanzada H. R., Maqsood A. Deep Reinforcement Learning

Control System. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2018, PID for Quadrotor Altitude Control. IEEE Transactions on 2018: 8927453. Control Systems Technology, 2025, 33(1): 521-530. [9] Melo A. G., Guedes I. P. ROS-Based Fuzzy PID for [13] Zhou L., Pljonkin A. GA-BP Hybrid PID for Quadrotor

Commercial Quadrotors. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic UAVs. Neurocomputing, 2022, 486: 18-32.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-28

How to Cite

(1)
Sheng, L. Fundamentals, Challenges, and Improved Algorithms of PID Control for Quadrotor UAVs. STECEP 2026, 4, 15342.