How to Reduce the Latency of Remote Medical Device Operations

Authors

  • Yichen Shen Suzhou International Academy Wujiang District, Suzhou

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61173/stecep16092

Keywords:

end‑to‑end latency, full‑link optimization, surgical robot, low‑latency communication

Abstract

As a key application of digital precision medicine, telesurgery is highly sensitive to end-to-end latency, which affects surgical manipulation synchronization, robotic control accuracy and patient safety. High-precision minimally invasive surgery requires latency below 50 ms, yet most existing methods only optimize isolated components, resulting in excessive latency that fails clinical requirements. This study proposes a full-chain latency optimization framework integrating deterministic communication, adjacent edge computing, AI motion prediction compensation and dual-link redundant transmission. Based on a cloud-edge-device architecture, the system optimizes latency across network, computation, encoding, device control and security layers via 5G URLLC, network slicing, H.265 intelligent encoding, LSTM delay compensation, lightweight encryption and zero-trust security design.Experimental results show the system stabilizes end-to-end latency at 23–50 ms, reduces network latency from 120 ms to 3–30 ms, and drops the video freezing rate from 12.7% to 0.3%. Clinical evaluations verify its surgical performance is consistent with conventional in-hospital robotic surgery, satisfying high-precision telesurgery requirements. This solution cuts the deployment cost of dedicated communication links. Despite limitations including insufficient remote 5G coverage, high device costs and unstable cross-operator networks, future research will integrate advanced communication and digital twin technologies to further reduce latency and promote standardized large-scale clinical deployment.

 

References

3GPP. (2024). TS 38.141 5G uRLLC low latency technical specification. 3GPP.

Anvari, M., Broderick, T., Stein, H., et al. (2005). The impact of latency on surgical precision and task completion during robotic-assisted remote telepresence surgery. Computer Aided Surgery, 10(2), 93–99.

Biotech. (2025). Multi-center clinical trial report on the safety and practicability of remote surgery in China: The 5G and exclusive dedicated line make a new breakthrough in the treatment of urinary tumor by minimally invasive surgery. Biotech Frontiers in Medicine, 10(20), 65–72.

Biotech. (2026). Network performance and latency in transcontinental telerobotic surgery. International Journal of Surgical Technology, 12(1), 33–41.

CGTN Europe. (2024, June 12). Chinese team perform world-first robotic surgery from Rome in Beijing. CGTN. https://newseu.cgtn.com/news/2024-06-12/Chinese-team-perform-world-first-robotic-surgery-from-Rome-in-Beijing-1um4yx45Ixq/p.html

Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences. (2022). 5G remote surgery video transmission experiment and low delay technology test report. China Digital Medicine, 17(8), 45–51.

Fan, Y., et al. (2024). 5G remote robot-assisted hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: A report of five cases and a literature review. Chinese Journal of Practical Surgery, 44(11), 1291–1294. https://doi.org/10.19538/j.cjps.issn1005-2208.2024.11.20

Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. (2025). Real-time and high-resolution video transmission and control practice for remote surgery combined with edge computing and 5G slices. Communication Technology, 58(6), 112–120.

Hu, M., et al. (2023). Remote animal experiments of "Tumai" surgical robot under 5G network environment. Research Square.

International Telecommunication Union (ITU). (2024). ITU-T Y.3501: Medical low latency communication standard (Recommendation ITU-T Y.3501). https://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-Y.3501

International Telecommunication Union (ITU). (2020). ITU-T Recommendation G.8271/Y.1366: Time and phase synchronization aspects of telecommunication networks. https://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-G.8271 (Accessed: 20 July 2026).

International Organization for Standardization (ISO) & International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC). (2024). ISO/IEC 30141:2024 Internet of Things—Reference architecture. https://www.iso.org/standard/65628.html (Accessed: 20 July 2026).

International Telecommunication Union (ITU). (2011). ITU-T Recommendation Y.1541: Network performance objectives for IP-based services. https://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-Y.1541 (Accessed: 20 July 2026).

IEEE. (2019). IEEE standard for a precision clock synchronization protocol for networked measurement and control systems (IEEE Std 1588-2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEESTD.2019.9120376

Kuo, C. H., Dai, J. S., & Dasgupta, P. (2017). Kinematic design considerations for robotic surgical systems. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 14(1), 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1109/TASE.2016.2579598

Lanfranco, A. R., Castellanos, A. E., Desai, J. P., & Meyers, W. C. (2004). Robotic surgery: A current perspective. Annals of Surgery, 239(1), 14–21.

Liang, X., & Cai, X. J. (2024). Current status and prospects of 5G telemedicine robotic surgery. Chinese Journal of Digestive Surgery, 23(4), 554–560. https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn115610-20240312-00149

Marescaux, J., Leroy, J., Gagner, M., Rubino, F., Mutter, D., Vix, M., Butner, S. E., & Smith, M. K. (2001). Transatlantic robot-assisted telesurgery. Nature, 413(6854), 379–380. https://doi.org/10.1038/35096636

MedSci. (2026). Clinical effects, existing problems, and prospects for 5G remote robotic surgery. Medical Science, 4(1), 78–92.

Perez, M., Song, X., Fischer, K., et al. (2015). Impact of delay on telesurgical performance. Surgical Endoscopy, 30(8), 3348–3356.

Surging News. (2025). 1200 km sky surgery! Yonghangzao robot "great surgery" success. Surgical Robots and Digital Medicine, 8(3), 112–118.

Tai, S., Wang, Y., Ye, S., et al. (2025). Safety and reliability of telesurgery in China: A multicenter, single-arm, phase I clinical trial. International Journal of Surgery, 6682–6687. https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000002792

U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2023). Marketing submission recommendations for a predetermined change control plan for artificial intelligence/machine learning-enabled device software functions (Document reference number: FDA-2023-D-0967). https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents

Wang, Y., Buehler, M., Farritor, S., et al. (2025). Expert consensus-based technical guidelines for remote robotic-assisted surgery and procedures. World Journal of Surgery, 49(7), 1708–1721. https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.12653

Xinhua News Agency. (2025). PLA General Hospital performs world's first low-orbit satellite remote surgery. Chinese Medical Journal, 105(27), 2021–2024.

Xu, S., Perez, M., Yang, K., Perrenot, C., Felblinger, J., & Hubert, J. (2014). Determination of the latency effects on surgical performance and the acceptable latency levels in telesurgery using the dV-Trainer® simulator. Surgical Endoscopy, 28(9), 2569–2576. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3504-z

Zhang, et al. (2025). Safety and reliability of telesurgery in China: A multicenter, single-arm, phase I clinical trial. The Lancet Regional Health – Western Pacific, 58, 101xxx.

Zhang, M., et al. (2025). A pilot study on the clinical feasibility of 5G remote robot-assisted gastrectomy. World Journal of Surgical Oncology, 23, Article 116. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-025-03780-8

Zhang, Q., Liu, J., & Zhao, G. (2018). Towards 5G enabled tactile robotic telesurgery. IEEE Network, 32(6), 20–27. https://doi.org/10.1109/MNET.2018.1800074

Downloads

Published

2026-10-01

How to Cite

(1)
Shen, Y. How to Reduce the Latency of Remote Medical Device Operations. STECEP 2026, 4, 16092.