Non-Invasive Blood Pressure Estimation Using Photoplethysmogram Morphological Features and Machine Learning

Authors

  • Bingzhe Zhao Department of Electrical & Electronic Engineering, University of Nottingham, Ningbo, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61173/stecep16302

Keywords:

Photoplethysmography (PPG), Cuffless blood pressure estimation, Morphological features, Machine learning, Continuous cardiovascular monitoring

Abstract

Continuous and unobtrusive blood pressure monitoring is vital for the early diagnosis and effective management of cardiovascular diseases. Conventional pneumatic cuffs cause physical discomfort during repeated measurements, while invasive catheterization poses substantial clinical risks. To overcome these limitations, this work proposes a non-invasive cuffless blood pressure estimation framework based on single-channel photoplethysmogram signals.  An automated signal processing pipeline segments individual pulse cycles and extracts 23 candidates morphological, area and derivative features. Then, screening by Pearson correlation identifies an optimal subset of twelve salient parameters. A strict subject-wise five-fold cross-validation scheme is used to systematically evaluate four representative machine learning regression models. The simulated data set contains 2,500 beat-to-beat samples, simulated according to benchmark hemodynamic distributions. XGBoost achieved the best performance in predicting systolic pressure, with MAE of 2.49 mmHg and correlation coefficient of 0.97. Random Forest performs slightly better for diastolic pressure (MAE = 4.21 mmHg) with a small difference with XGBoost (MAE = 4.28 mmHg, r=0.74). The simulated conditions’ numerical errors meet the benchmark thresholds of the ANSI/AAMI/ISO standard and the British Hypertension Society Grade A protocol. This does not mean clinical validation. These results validate the feasibility of lightweight, interpretable machine learning regression on wearable healthcare hardware for continuous cardiovascular monitoring.

References

G. A. Roth et al., ‘Global Burden of Cardiovascular Diseases and Risk Factors, 1990-2019: Update From the GBD 2019 Study’, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 76, no. 25, pp. 2982–3021, Dec. 2020, Accessed: Aug. 30, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0735109720377755

J. Allen, ‘Photoplethysmography and Its Application in Clinical Physiological Measurement’, Physiological Measurement, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. R1-R39, Feb. 2007, doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/28/3/r01.

H. Gesche, D. Grosskurth, G. Küchler, and A. Patzak, ‘Continuous Blood Pressure Measurement by Using the Pulse Transit Time: Comparison to a Cuff-Based Method’, European Journal of Applied Physiology, vol. 112, no. 1, pp. 309–315, May 2011, doi: 10.1007/s00421-011-1983-3.

M. Elgendi, ‘On the Analysis of Fingertip Photoplethysmogram Signals’, Current Cardiology Reviews, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 14–25, Jun. 2012, doi: 10.2174/157340312801215782.

G. Slapničar, N. Mlakar, and M. Luštrek, ‘Blood Pressure Estimation From Photoplethysmogram Using a Spectro-Temporal Deep Neural Network’, Sensors, vol. 19, no. 15, p. 3420, Aug. 2019, doi: 10.3390/s19153420.

A. L. Goldberger et al., ‘PhysioBank, PhysioToolkit, and PhysioNet’, Circulation, vol. 101, no. 23, Jun. 2000, doi: 10.1161/01.cir.101.23.e215.

T. Chen and C. Guestrin, ‘XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System’, Jun. 2016. Accessed: Sep. 03, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1603.02754

G. S. Stergiou et al., ‘A Universal Standard for the Validation of Blood Pressure Measuring Devices’, Hypertension, vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 368–374, Mar. 2018, doi: 10.1161/hypertensionaha.117.10237.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-01

How to Cite

(1)
Zhao, B. Non-Invasive Blood Pressure Estimation Using Photoplethysmogram Morphological Features and Machine Learning. STECEP 2026, 4, 16302.