Reliability Challenges of LLM Agents: Systemic Failure Causes and Governance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61173/wtry7121Keywords:
LLM Agents, Reliability, Systemic FailureAbstract
As Large Language Model (LLM) agents advance toward industrial applications, their systemic reliability challenges become critical obstacles. This review comprehensively analyzes these issues to establish a framework for trustworthy agents, first categorizing key systemic failures into four types: Cognitive-level, Decision-level, Execution-level, and Security & Boundary failures. It then identifies five root causes: training data limitations, model architecture/algorithm defects, imperfect alignment and reinforcement learning, brittle tool/ environment interactions, and vulnerabilities in knowledge representation/update. To address these, the paper proposes a dual-track strategy with a multi-level governance system—emphasizing pre-deployment benchmarks, post-deployment monitoring, and a macro-framework covering multi-agent coordination, interpretability, traceability, responsibility attribution, and full lifecycle risk management—alongside intrinsic enhancement of model factuality, reasoning, alignment, and architecture. This paper aims to provide a systematic perspective and structured approach for building more reliable and responsible LLM agents. It promotes the integration of theoretical safety and practical deployment, driving the advancement of LLM agents from the experimental to the industrial level.
References
lying factors stem from the inherent limitations of Train- representations, 2022, October. ing Data and Model Architecture, the imperfections of [2] Zhou S, Xu F F, Zhu H, Zhou X, Lo R, Sridhar A, Neubig G. Alignment and RLHF, the brittleness of Interaction with Webarena: A realistic web environment for building autonomous Complex Tools and Environments, and the fundamental agents. arXiv preprint, 2023. Vulnerability of Prompt Engineering and the structural [3] Liu X, Yu H, Zhang H, Xu Y, Lei X, Lai H, Tang J. Defects in Knowledge Representation and Update Mech- Agentbench: Evaluating llms as agents. arXiv preprint, 2023. anisms (including the statistical nature of knowledge and [4] Chu J, Sha Z, Backes M, Zhang Y. Reconstruct your previous catastrophic forgetting). conversations! Comprehensively investigating privacy leakage To counter these systemic challenges, a multi-tiered, in- risks in conversations with GPT models. In: Proceedings of the tegrated Governance System was proposed. This system 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language advocates for enhancing reliability through two parallel Processing (EMNLP), 2024. strategies: [5] Wei J, Wang X, Schuurmans D, Bosma M, Ichter B, Xia F, Intrinsic Reliability Enhancement: Strengthening the core Chi E, Le Q V, Zhou D. Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits capabilities of the model and architecture by improving Reasoning in Large Language Models. Advances in Neural
Knowledge and Factuality via Retrieval-Augmented Gen- Information Processing Systems, 2022, 31: 24124-24137. eration (RAG) and Knowledge Editing, enhancing Rea- [6] Ouyang L, Wu J, Jiang X, Almeida D, Wainwright C L, soning and Planning through advanced prompting (Chain- Mishkin P, Zhang C, Agarwal S, Slama K, Ray A, Schulman of-Thought/Tree-of-Thought), deepening Alignment and J, Hilton J, Kelton F, Miller L, Simens M, Askell A, Welinder Values, and optimizing the agent architecture with Mem- P, Christiano P, Leike J, Lowe R. Training language models to ory Mechanisms, Self-Reflection Loops, and Robust Tool follow instructions with human feedback. Advances in Neural
Calling. Information Processing Systems, 2022, 31: 27730-27744. Systemic Governance Frameworks: Establishing a mac- [7] Lester B, Al-Rfou R, Constant N. The power of scale for ro-level framework that includes Quantitative Assessment parameter-efficient prompt tuning. arXiv preprint, 2021. and Continuous Monitoring (Pre-Deployment Benchmark- [8] Min S, Lyu X, Holtzman A, Artetxe M, Lewis M, Hajishirzi ing and Post-Deployment Drift Monitoring); promoting H, Zettlemoyer L. Rethinking the role of demonstrations: What Coordination and Alignment of Multi-Agent Systems; im- makes in-context learning work?. arXiv preprint, 2022. plementing Interpretability, Traceability, and Responsibil- [9] Petroni F, Rocktäschel T, Riedel S, Lewis P, Bakhtin A, ity Attribution to ensure transparency and accountability; Wu Y, Miller A. Language models as knowledge bases?. In: and embedding Lifecycle Risk Management by making Proceedings of the 2019 conference on empirical methods in Impact Assessment and the design of mitigation strategies natural language processing and the 9th international joint mandatory from the initial design phase. conference on natural language processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP),
Although this study relies primarily on theoretical analy- 2019: 2463-2473. sis and literature integration, and the proposed governance [10] Micheli V, Alonso E, Fleuret F. Transformers are sampleframework requires further empirical validation in diverse efficient world models. arXiv preprint, 2022. industrial scenarios, it establishes a critical foundation. [11] Titzer B L. Whose baseline compiler is it anyway?. In: 2024 However, this research offers a systematic analytical IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Code Generation and
perspective and a comprehensive governance roadmap Optimization (CGO), 2024: 207-220. IEEE.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 by the authors.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
