The Structural Impact of Bitcoin Spot ETFs on Liquidity and Risk Spillovers in the Cryptocurrency Market

Authors

  • Shiyu Tang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61173/mpgy2h45

Keywords:

Bitcoin spot ETFs, spot-futures linkage, liquidity layering, risk spillover, structural mutation

Abstract

The listing of Bitcoin spot exchange-traded funds (ETFs) is regarded as a milestone in the “institutionalization” process of the cryptocurrency market.There has yet to be a systematic review in academia as to whether this is a structural inflection point for liquidity and risk spilloversThe microstructure of the Bitcoin Market following the launch of Bitcoin spot ETFs (Jan 2024). Cryptocurrency market underwent significant changes. First, the Authorized Participant (AP) subscription and redemption mechanism introduced by the ETFs effectively compresses price spreads across exchanges and enhances weekend market liquidity depth.These customer quotes show the market price of Ethereum Futures. This also has the effect of concentrating liquidity on leading platforms, making it more difficult for small to mid-sized exchanges to survive. Second, by incorporating Bitcoin (BTC) into the traditional margin account system via ETFs, risk contagion has transformed from an “extreme tail event” into a “routine, strong feedback pattern,” gradually diminishing Bitcoin’s hedging properties. Lastly, the integration of futures-spot arbitrage activities with margin accounts shortens the duration of volatility spillovers. This paper constructs a review framework of “institutional shock—futures-spot interaction—market structure evolution,” providing replicable and updatable literature references and empirical support for subsequent regulatory monitoring and cross-asset portfolio optimization for investors.

References

[1] Mark M, Sila J, & Weber T A. Quantifying endogeneity of cryptocurrency markets. The European Journal of Finance, 2020, 28(7): 784–799.

[2] Sam Baker. Why Business Owners Are Putting 22% of Profits Into Bitcoin. River. com, 2025.

[3] FinaceRun. Data Analysis of Bitcoin Holder Structure and $15 Trillion Market Cap Estimates. Panewslab. com, 2025.

[4] Brandon Kae, & Ivan Wu. Bitcoin options exposure tops $57 billion amid soaring institutional hedging demand. Theblock. co, 2025.

[5] Vassilios Babalos, Elie Bouri, & Rangan Gupta. Does the introduction of US spot Bitcoin ETFs affect spot returns and volatility of major cryptocurrencies?. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 2025, 102: 102006.

[6] Zhang H, Zhang A D, & Gao M. Poisson process Models of extreme volatility of Bitcoin prices. Sciencepaper Online, 2023.

[7] Yue Q, Yifan W, & Tian X. Forecasting Bitcoin realized volatility by measuring the spillover effect among cryptocurrencies. Economics Letters, 2021, 208: 110092.

[8] Alamaren A S, Gokmenoglu K K, & Taspinar N. Volatility spillovers among leading cryptocurrencies and US energy and technology companies. Financial Innovation, 2024, 10(1): 81.

[9] Korkusuz B. Volatility Transmission in Digital Assets: Ethereum’s Rising Influence. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 2025, 18(3): 111.

[10] Sene N, Konte M, & Aduda J. Pricing Bitcoin under Double Exponential Jump-Diffusion Model with Asymmetric Jumps Stochastic Volatility. Journal of Mathematical Finance, 2021, 11: 313-330.

[11] UkuriaOC, CryptoVizArt, & Glassnode. Liquidity Crush. Glassnode. com, 2025.

[12] Tanay Ved, & Victor Ramirez. Is Bitcoin Decoupling from the Market?. Coin Metrics, 2025.

[13] Kaiko Research. Quarterly Market Report: Q1 2024. Kaiko. com, 2024.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-28