Forest Fire Environmental Drivers and Predictive Modeling Approaches

Authors

  • Ruifeng Jing
  • Handa Zhang
  • Guanqi Zhou

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61173/2kmtse14

Keywords:

Environmental Drivers, Predictive Modeling, Machine Learning

Abstract

This article focuses on the risks of wildfires driven by heat waves, droughts, and human activities, and points out the research gap in the absence of transferable and interpretable early warning guidelines in data-scarce areas and urban-rural interface zones (WUI). Through a structured literature review and cross-regional comparison, we comprehensively evaluated the forest types and fuel structures in Southeast Asia, Europe, and the Americas, and examined the prediction methods ranging from process simulators (FARSITE, Prometheus) to machine learning pipelines. We proposed a normative framework that integrates spatial risk mapping with threshold-based early warnings. The results show that humidity and wind speed thresholds are common triggers for large fires; fuel continuity, peatlands, and WUI expansion significantly amplify spread and exposure; mixed modeling (using mechanism model outputs and multimodal data for training ML) can enhance prediction skills and transferability. Based on this, this article proposes an implementable “P4” path (perception - preparation - prediction - pre-processing) to support earlier and more operational risk management through integration of sensing, modeling, and operation.

References

[1] Bowman, D. M. J. S., et al. The global drivers of wildfire. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 2024.

[2] Forkel, M., et al. Global and Regional Trends and Drivers of Fire Under Climate Change. Reviews of Geophysics, 2020.

[3] Santana, V. M., Keeley, J. E., et al. Classification of forest fuels in selected fire-prone ecosystems. Annals of Forest Science, 2022.

[4] de Groot, W. J., et al. Crown fuel consumption in Canadian boreal forest fires. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 2021.

[5] Finney M A. FARSITE: A fire area simulator for fire managers. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-158, USDA Forest Service, 1995.

[6] Finney M A, Andrews P L. FARSITE—Model development and evaluation. Res. Pap. RMRS-RP-4, USDA Forest Service, 1998.

[7] Tymstra C, Bryce R W, Wotton B M, Armitage O B. The Canadian Wildland Fire Growth Simulation Model: Prometheus. Information Report NOR-X-417, Natural Resources Canada, 2010.

[8] Andrianarivony H S, et al. Machine learning and deep learning for wildfire spread prediction: A review. Fire, 2024, 7(12): 482.

[9] Xu Z, Li J, Cheng S, Rui X, Zhao Y, He H, et al. Deep learning for wildfire risk prediction: Integrating remote sensing and environmental data. Preprint, 2025.

[10] Singh H, Ang L M, Paudyal D, Acuna M, Srivastava P K. A comprehensive review of empirical and dynamic wildfire simulators and machine learning techniques used for prediction. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 2025, 30: 935–968.

[11] Moghim S, Mehrabi M. Wildfire assessment using machine learning algorithms in different regions. Fire Ecology, 2024, 20: 104.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-28