Fibrous Microplastics as an Independent Risk Factor: Bioaccumulation, Gut– Liver Translocation, and Trophic Biomagnification in Marine Food WebsMarine Trophic Chains
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61173/k9gwye52Keywords:
fibrous microplastics, bioaccumulation, gut–liver pathway, chronic toxicity, morphology-toxicity model, energy metabolismAbstract
Fibrous microplastics dominate marine debris yet remain understudied compared with spherical and fragmented forms. Their high aspect ratio (10–50) confers unique mechanical flexibility and surface reactivity. In controlled exposure experiments (10–1,000 μg L⁻¹; 7–60 days), fish and bivalves retained fibers in intestinal villi with a bioaccumulation factor of 3.8 ± 0.4, three to four times higher than other morphologies. Micro-FTIR imaging tracked fibers crossing the intestinal epithelium and localizing in hepatic lobules, indicating a novel “gut–liver” pathway. At environmentally relevant concentrations (10 μg L⁻¹, 60 days), fibers disrupted eight energy metabolism pathways, doubled superoxide dismutase activity, and tripled tumor necrosis factor-α expression, suggesting chronic metabolic and inflammatory stress. In a threelevel food web experiment (algae → shrimp → fish), fibers exhibited significant biomagnification (BMF = 1.75 ± 0.12), unlike spheres or fragments (BMF < 1.0). These findings demonstrate that morphology is an independent determinant of microplastic risk, beyond size and concentration.
References
[1] Eswar Marcharla. Microplastics in marine ecosystems: A comprehensive review of biological and ecological implications and its mitigation approach using nanotechnology for the sustainable environment. Environmental Research, 2024, 256: 119181.
[2] Yang Huirong. Microplastics in the Marine Environment: Sources, Fates, Impacts and Microbial Degradation. Toxics, 2021, 9(2): 41.
[3] Malankowska Magdalena. Review on Microplastic Pollution in Marine Ecosystems: Sources, Distribution, Ecological Impacts, and Future Directions. Proceedings of the Zoological Society, 2021, 74(1): 1–15.
[4] Zhou Qingwei. Microplastics in the Marine Environment: A Review of Their Sources, Formation, Fate, and Ecotoxicological Impact. In: IntechOpen, 2020.
[5] Puspa.L.Adhikari.Evaluating Microplastic Experimental Design and Exposure Studies in Aquatic Organisms. Springer, 2021.
[6] Cverenkárová Klára. Microplastics in the Food Chain. Life (Basel), 2021, 11(12): 1349.
[7] Liu Shaochong. Fibrous microplastics in the environment: Sources, occurrence, impacts, and mitigation strategies. Environmental Research, 2022, 212: 113234.
[8] National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI). NCEI’s Updated and Expanded Groundbreaking Microplastics Database. NOAA News, 2021.
[9] Jahedi Faezeh. Micro- and nanoplastic toxicity in humans: Exposure pathways, cellular effects, and mitigation strategies. Environmental Research, 2022, 209: 112861.
[10] Sun Xiaoxia. Characteristics and retention of microplastics in the digestive tracts of fish from the Yellow Sea. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 2021, 168: 112415.
[11] Huang Zhuizui. Microplastic: A potential threat to human and animal health by interfering with the intestinal barrier function and changing the intestinal microenvironment. Science of The Total Environment, 2021, 785: 147365.
[12] Cole Matthew. A novel method for preparing microplastic fibers. Scientific Reports, 2016, 6: 34519.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 by the authors.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
