Comparative Study of Lightweight Segmentation Models for Medical Cell Imagery in Resource-Constrained Environments
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61173/8h9ezj72Keywords:
Medical Image segmentation, Nuclear segmentation, Deep learning Fast-SCNN, MobileNetV2Abstract
Abstract Precise medical cell image segmentation is an essential prerequisite for cell counting, pathological diagnosis, cancer grading and personalized treatment planning, yet mainstream deep learning segmentation models are hard to deploy in grassroots medical institutions and portable microscopic devices due to their massive parameters and high computational complexity. To address this critical issue, this study evaluated three representative convolutional neural network models for medical nuclear segmentation tasks under GPU-free, resourceconstrained conditions, using the 2018 Data Science Bowl dataset with diverse tissue types and imaging modalities. The models included the lightweight Half-UNet as the benchmark, transfer learning-based MobileNetV2-UNet with pre-trained weights, and real-time-oriented Fast- SCNN. Experimental results show that MobileNetV2- UNet achieves the optimal Dice coefficient of 0.9175 with relatively low resource consumption, significantly outperforming the benchmark; Fast-SCNN sacrifices some accuracy (Dice coefficient of 0.7504) but gains superior inference speed (215.8 FPS), which is 3.8 times that of the benchmark. This study provides empirical evidence and technical references for efficient automated medical image analysis on low-computing hardware, highlighting the necessity of flexibly selecting lightweight models according to different clinical demands.
References
[1] Ronneberger O, Fischer P, and Brox T, U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation, in Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI), 2015, pp. 234-241.
[2] Zhou S K et al., A Review of Deep Learning in Medical Imaging: Imaging Traits, Technology Trends, and Types of Goal Dimension, Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 109, no. 5, pp. 936- 968, 2021.
[3] Caicedo J et al., Data Science Bowl 2018, Kaggle, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.kaggle. com/c/data-sciencebowl-2018.
[4] Minaee S, Boykov Y, Porikli F, Plaza A, Kehtarnavaz N, and Terzopoulos D, Image Segmentation Using Deep Learning: A Survey, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2021, vol. 44, no. 7, pp. 3523-3542.
[5] Ma J, Wei Y, Zhang Y, and Wang Y, A Comprehensive Review of Knowledge Distillation for Lightweight Medical Image Segmentation, ResearchGate, 2024.
[6] Poudel R P, Liwicki S, and Cipolla R, Fast-SCNN: Fast Semantic Segmentation Network, arXiv preprint arXiv:1902.04502, 2019.
[7] Sandler M, Howard A, Zhu M, Zhmoginov A, and Chen L C, MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottlenecks, in Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2018, pp. 4510-4520.
[8] Saiprasad K M et al., Histopathology Image Segmentation Using MobileNetV2 based U-net Model, IEEE Xplore, 2021.
[9] Sudre C H, Li W, Vercauteren T, Ourselin S, and Cardoso M J, Generalised Dice Overlap as a Deep Learning Loss Function for Highly Unbalanced Segmentations, in Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysis and Multimodal Learning for Clinical Decision Support, 2017, pp. 240-248.
[10] Behrouz A, Azar Z T, and Mofrad M R K, LIT-Unet: a lightweight and effective model for medical image segmentation, PubMed, 2024.
[11] Nguyen D C et al., FedSegNet: A Federated Learning Framework for 3D Medical Image Segmentation, International Journal of Ethical AI Application, 2025.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 by the authors.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
