Environment-Driven Site Selection Model for Mega-Sporting Events
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61173/hxyw8m08Keywords:
Sporting event site selection, Environmental sustainability, Analytic Hierarchy Process, Entropy Weight Method, TOPSIS, Hybrid weightingAbstract
Traditional site selection decision-making for largescale sporting events has long suffered from insufficient attention to environmental sustainability, resulting in serious problems such as high carbon emissions, excessive energy and water consumption, serious waste generation, traffic pollution, and huge ecological pressure. In order to improve the scientificity and green performance of venue selection for mega-sporting events, this study constructs a complete environmental sustainability evaluation system including 6 dimensions and 14 indicators, and formulates the multi-city multi-attribute decision problem as a hybrid-weighted TOPSIS model. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is used to measure subjective weights derived from expert experience, and the Entropy Weight Method (EWM) is used to calculate objective weights reflecting real data differences. The two groups of weights are fused under the optimal parameter θ*=0.1378 to obtain stable and reliable comprehensive weights. Then the TOPSIS model is used to rank the environmental sustainability levels of candidate cities. In addition, Monte Carlo simulation and sensitivity analysis are carried out to verify the stability and robustness of the model. The results show that Seattle ranks first with a comprehensive score of 0.822, which can reduce about 30,000 tons of carbon dioxide equivalent emissions in a single event. The correlation coefficient between the model output score and the official NFL rating is as high as 0.973 (p<0.01), demonstrating high accuracy and practical value. This study supplements missing details, optimizes logical consistency, and introduces two innovations: an eventadaptive dynamic weight adjustment mechanism and an environmental risk early warning module. The framework provides a scientific, data-driven, robust, and scalable decision-making tool for green site selection of the Super Bowl, Formula 1, Olympic Games, FIFA World Cup, and other international mega-sporting events.
References
[1] UNFCCC. Sports for Climate Action Framework[R]. Bonn: United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, 2021.
[2] García-Palomares, J. C., Gutiérrez, J., & Latorre, M. (2020). Sustainability assessment of mega-sporting events: A review and research agenda. Journal of Cleaner Production, 272, 122768.
[3] Mascarenhas, R., Almeida, A. (2018). Environmental impacts of the 2014 FIFA World Cup in Brazil. Journal of Environmental Management, 222, 209-217.
[4] Wang, Y., Li, M., & Zhang, L. (2022). Multi-criteria decision making for sustainable site selection of mega-sporting events. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 32, 112-124.
[5] Li, M., Wang, Y., & Zhang, L. (2023). Hybrid weighting model for environmental sustainability evaluation of Olympic Games site selection. Sustainable Cities and Society, 90, 104365.
[6] Chen, W., He, Z., & Shen, Z. (2020). Carbon footprint evaluation of the 2018 PyeongChang Winter Olympics. Journal of Sustainable Tourism.
[7] Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York: McGraw-Hill.
[8] Hwang, C. L., & Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications. New York: Springer-Verlag.
[9] Shannon, C. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27, 379-423.
[10] Zhang, T., Jiang, Y., & Shi, H. (2021). Dynamic weight adjustment for sustainability evaluation of outdoor sporting events. Sustainability, 13(18), 10267.
[11] IOC. Olympic Games Sustainability Standards[R]. Lausanne: International Olympic Committee, 2020.
[12] Smith, J., Johnson, K., & Brown, A. (2022). NFL Super Bowl site selection: Economic and environmental factors. Sport Management Review, 25.
[13] U.S. EPA. Environmental Risk Assessment Standards for Urban Events[R]. Washington D.C.: United States Environmental Protection Agency, 2022.
[14] Linstone, H. A., & Turoff, M. (1975). The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
[15] Saltelli, A., Ratto, M., Andres, T., et al. (2008). Global Sensitivity Analysis: The Primer. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 by the authors.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
