Comparison Between Option Pricing model and Discounted Cash Flow model: A study Case of Electronic Arts Company
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61173/kn265042Keywords:
Discounted cash flow, Binomial option pricing model, Cox ross rubinstein, Firm valuation, Electronic artsAbstract
This paper is a comparative analysis of the Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) model and the binomial option pricing model of Electronic Arts company as a case study. The DCF model will be used to determine the intrinsic value of the firm based on financial and market data obtained through public sources. The value of a call option in the stock of the company within a short period is assessed using the binomial model. These findings indicate that the DCF model gives a firm value of about 36.6 billion USD whereas the binomial model gives an option value of about 14.6 USD. The reason behind this immense difference is the inherent differences in model structure and objectives of valuation. The DCF model is a deterministic and linear model, and the binomial model is a stochastic model with volatility and a convex payoff structure. Further discussion shows that the DCF model is better applied in estimating long-term intrinsic value. The results identify the complementary nature of the two strategies and propose a possibility of having a more in-depth picture of firm value, which might be more relevant in the high uncertainty and innovation industry.
References
[1] Petersen M A, Plenborg T. Financial statement analysis and valuation. London: Pearson, 2012.
[2] Hubalek F, Schachermayer W. The limitations of classical option pricing under market frictions. Finance and Stochastics, 2021, 25(2): 303-335.
[3] Begenau J, Farboodi M, Veldkamp L. Big data in finance and the growth of large firms. Journal of Monetary Economics, 2018, 97: 71-87.
[4] Grenadier S R, Malenko A. Real options signaling games with applications to corporate finance. Journal of Finance, 2018, 73(4): 1663-1715.
[5] Bolton P, Chen H, Wang N. A unified theory of Tobin's q, corporate investment, financing, and risk management. Journal of Finance, 2019, 74(3): 1545-1578.
[6] Damodaran A. Investment valuation: Tools and techniques for determining the value of any asset. 3rd ed. New York: Wiley, 2012.
[7] Cox J C, Ross S A, Rubinstein M. Option pricing: A simplified approach. Journal of Financial Economics, 1979, 7(3): 229-263.
[8] Trigeorgis L. Real options: Managerial flexibility and strategy in resource allocation. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1996.
[9] Copeland T E, Antikarov V. Real options: A practitioner's guide. New York: Texere, 2001.
[10] Berk J, DeMarzo P. Corporate finance. 5th ed. London: Pearson, 2020. Dean&Francis Qiaoyang Li
[11] Koller T, Goedhart M, Wessels D. Valuation: Measuring and managing the value of companies. 6th ed. Hoboken: Wiley, 2015.
[12] Damodaran A. The dark side of valuation: Valuing young, distressed, and complex businesses. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River: FT Press, 2010.
[13] Alexander C, Chen X, Ward C. Risk-adjusted valuation for real option decisions. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2021, 191: 1046-1064.
[14] Nadarajah S, Secomandi N. A review of the operations literature on real options in energy. European Journal of Operational Research, 2023, 309(2): 469-487.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 by the authors.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
