Longitudinal Analysis of World Happiness Scores (2015–2019)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61173/qs3nv356Keywords:
GDP, happiness score, linear mixed-effects modelAbstract
The World Happiness Report provides annual data on self-reported life satisfaction and associated socio-economic factors for countries worldwide. In this study, a statistical model is used to explain and predict national happiness scores from 2015 to 2019 using six key factors (GDP, social support, healthy life expectancy, freedom, generosity, and corruption perceptions). The linear mixed-effects model is employed to account for repeated measurements for each country over time, including country-specific random intercepts. The mixed model captures both the differences between countries and the changes in happiness over time. Results show that GDP per capita, freedom to make life choices, and healthy life expectancy are significant positive predictors of happiness, while factors like generosity have a more minor and statistically insignificant effect when other variables are controlled. Social support did not exhibit a significant independent effect in the multivariate context. There is substantial unexplained variance between countries, validating the inclusion of country-level random effects. The model achieves high predictive accuracy (conditional R² ≈ 0.93), and diagnostic checks indicate assumptions are satisfied. These findings underscore the importance of economic and personal freedom factors in national happiness and highlight that country-specific characteristics play a significant role.
References
[1] Kaggle. World Happiness Report Dataset (2015–2019). United Nations Sustainable Development Solutions Network. Available: https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/unsdsn/worldhappiness (accessed Jul. 2025).
[2] MathWorks. Longitudinal Analysis – Statistics and Machine Learning Toolbox Documentation. Available: https://ww2. mathworks.cn/help/stats/longitudinal-analysis.html (accessed Jul. 2025).
[3] J. F. Helliwell, R. Layard, J. D. Sachs, and J.-E. De Neve (eds.), World Happiness Report 2020. New York: Sustainable Development Solutions Network, 2020. Available: https:// worldhappiness.report
[4] R. A. Easterlin, L. Angelescu McVey, M. Switek, O. Sawangfa, and J. S. Zweig, “The happiness–income paradox revisited,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 107, no. 52, pp. 22463–22468, 2010, doi:10.1073/ pnas.1015962107.
[5] M. L. Bryan and S. P. Jenkins, “Multilevel modelling of country effects: A cautionary tale,” European Sociological Review, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 3–22, 2016, doi:10.1093/esr/jcv059.
[6] Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), OECD Guidelines on Measuring Subjective Well- Being. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2013.
[7] D. K. Behera, D. B. Rahut, M. Padmaja, and A. K. Dash, “Socioeconomic determinants of happiness: Empirical evidence from developed and developing countries,” Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, vol. 109, p. 102187, 2024, doi:10.1016/j.socec.2024.102187.
[8] E. Diener, S. Oishi, and R. E. Lucas, “National accounts of subjective well-being,” American Psychologist, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 234–242, 2015, doi:10.1037/a0038899.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 by the authors.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
