Engines of Change: Comparison of Environmental Impacts Between Traditional Engines and Alternative Powertrains

Authors

  • Anqi Xi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61173/8dsm8z71

Keywords:

Powertrain Comparison, Internal Combus-tion Engine, Battery Electric Vehicle, Fuel Cell Vehicle, Vehicle Emissions

Abstract

This report provides a systematic assessment of the environmental influences associated with traditional internal combustion engine (ICE) cars, specifically spark ignition (SI) and compression ignition (CI) engines, and four consultant opportunity powertrains: hybrid electric motors (HEVs), plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs), battery electric powered cars (BEVs), and fuel cell vehicles (FCVs). As the transportation sector continues to contribute about 29% of total U.S. greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, identifying cleaner car technologies has become a pressing issue. The analysis adopts a well-to-wheel (WTW) approach, accounting not only for direct tailpipe emissions but also upstream emissions related to fuel production, power generation, and battery or hydrogen sourcing. The results show that while SI and CI engines emit significant levels of NOx, CO, HC, and particulate matter, hybrid and electric powertrains significantly reduce those pollutants, particularly BEVs and FCVs, which have zero tailpipe emissions. However, the overall sustainability of BEVs and FCVs hinges on the cleanliness of the electric grid and hydrogen production methods, respectively. Moreover, factors such as regenerative braking, energy recovery, driving styles, infrastructure availability, and lifecycle issues (e.g., battery production and disposal) affect actual-world performance. The report concludes that the transition to low-emission transportation should be coupled with decarbonization of the power supply. BEVs and FCVs powered by renewable sources constitute the most promising pathways towards sustainable mobility, while HEVs and PHEVs function as realistic transitional solutions. This work aims to provide comprehensive insight into powertrain-specific environmental trade-offs and to inform individual and policy-level decisions for more sustainable transportation options.

References

[1] U.S. Department of Energy. Transportation sector emissions. 2021, 2025-08-05. https://afdc.energy.gov/data/10312.

[2] Apte J S, Brauer M, Cohen A J, Ezzati M. Ambient particulate air pollution and daily mortality in 652 cities[J]. New England Journal of Medicine, 2023, 388(8): 700–709.

[3] World Health Organization. Air pollution and child health: prescribing clean air[R]. Geneva: WHO, 2018.

[4] ICCT. A global comparison of the life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions of combustion engine and electric passenger cars[R]. Washington, D.C.: International Council on Clean

[5] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Inventory of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions and sinks: 1990–2021[R]. Washington, D.C.: EPA, 2023.

[6] Heywood J B. Internal combustion engine fundamentals[M]. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Education, 2018.

[7] Encyclopaedia Britannica. Four-stroke cycle. 2025, 2025-08- 05. https://www.britannica.com/technology/four-stroke-cycle.

[8] Encyclopaedia Britannica. Diesel engine. 2025, 2025-08-05. https://www.britannica.com/technology/diesel-engine.

[9] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Nitrogen oxides (NOx) pollution. 2023, 2025-08-05. https://www.epa.gov/no2- pollution.

[10] Zhou Y, Wu Y, Yang L. Characterization of particulate matter emitted from diesel engines and the effects of emission control technologies[J]. Atmospheric Pollution Research, 2019, 10(1): 120–129.

[11] Fercuson C R, Kirkpatrick A T. Internal combustion engines: Applied thermosciences[M]. 3rd ed. Hoboken: Wiley, 2015.

[12] Ehsani M, Gao Y, Longo S, et al. Modern electric, hybrid electric, and fuel cell vehicles[M]. 3rd ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2018.

[13] Toyota Motor Corporation. Prius fuel economy data. 2023, 2025-08-05. https://global.toyota/en/prius/.

[14] Lin X, Zhang G, Nguyen C T P, et al. Novel energy management strategy for a dual-motor hybrid electric vehicle[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2022, 252: 115054.

[15] Chan C C. The state of the art of electric and hybrid vehicles[J]. Proceedings of the IEEE, 2007, 95(4): 704–718.

[16] Genspark. Differences between plug-in hybrids and rangeextended electric vehicles. 2024, 2025-08-05. https://genspark. com/differences-between-plug-in-hybrids-and-range-extendedelectric-vehicles.

[17] Hawkins T R, Singh B, Majeau-bettez G, et al. Comparative environmental life cycle assessment of conventional and electric vehicles[J]. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2013, 17(1): 53–64.

[18] International Council on Clean Transportation. Real-world CO2 emissions from new passenger cars in Europe. 2021, 2025- 08-05. https://theicct.org/publication/real-world-co2-emissionsnew-passenger-cars-europe/.

[19] Bieker G. A global comparison of the life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions of combustion engine and electric passenger cars. International Council on Clean Transportation, 2021, 2025-08- 05. https://theicct.org/publication/global-lca-passenger-carsjul2021.

[20] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Sources of greenhouse gas emissions. 2022, 2025-08-05. https://www.epa. gov/ghgemissions/sources-greenhouse-gas-emissions.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-19