Comparative Analysis of PBR and NPR: Technical Pathways, Resource Investment and Applicability

Authors

  • Junhao Cui

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61173/brg0ar49

Keywords:

Physically Based Rendering, Non-Photorealistic Rendering, Comparison of Rendering Techniques, Low-Budget Production

Abstract

Physically Based Rendering (PBR) and Non-Photorealistic Rendering (NPR) represent the two main development paths in computer graphics. PBR emphasizes physical realism and has become the standard in film and largescale games, while NPR highlights stylized expression and is commonly found in animation and indie works. For low-budget production teams, finding a balance between visual effects and resource costs is a key issue. This paper provides a comprehensive review of typical research and applications of photorealistic rendering (PBR) and Non-Photorealistic Rendering (NPR) based on a systematic survey of relevant literature. The study starts from the technical approach, analyzing the differences between the two in rendering principles and implementation methods. At the same time, from the perspective of computing and production cost analysis, compare its input requirements in terms of hardware computing power, asset creation, labor costs, and development cycle. Finally, combining practical application scenarios such as films, games, and animation, the paper explore their applicability and limitations in different types of works. Building on this foundation, this paper further draws on existing academic research and industry case studies to summarize the respective strengths and weaknesses of the two approaches, and proposes reasonable selection strategies under low-cost constraints, with the aim of providing references for future research and practical production.

References

[1] Cook R L and Torrance K E, A reflectance model for Dean&Francis Junhao Cui computer graphics. ACM Transactions on Graphics, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 7–24, 1982.

[2] Kajiya J T, The rendering equation. Proceedings of the 13th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques (SIGGRAPH ‚86), pp. 143–150, 1986.

[3] Gooch B, Coombe G and Shirley P, A non-photorealistic lighting model for automatic technical illustration. Proceedings of SIGGRAPH, pp. 447–452, 1998.

[4] Hertzmann A, Painterly rendering with curved brush strokes of multiple sizes. Proceedings of SIGGRAPH, pp. 453–460, 2001.

[5] Chai M, Gao L and Fu H, A survey on non-photorealistic rendering: The state of the art. Computer Graphics Forum (Eurographics), vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 607–632, 2020.

[6] Jing Y, Yang Y, Feng Z, Ye J, Yu Y and Song M, Neural style transfer: A review. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, vol. 26, no. 11, pp. 3365–3385, 2020.

[7] Tewari A, Thies J, Mildenhall B, et al., Neural rendering: A survey. Computer Graphics Forum, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 701–727, 2020.

[8] Burley B, Physically based shading at Disney. ACM SIGGRAPH 2012 Courses, 2012.

[9] Zhang Y, Zhao H and Wang L, PBR-NeRF: Physically based neural radiance fields with reflectance decomposition. IEEE/ CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2024.

[10] Li X, Chen Z and Liu Y, TexGaussian: Generating highquality PBR materials via octree-based 3D Gaussian splatting. ACM SIGGRAPH Asia 2024 Technical Papers, 2024.

[11] DeCarlo D, Finkelstein A, Rusinkiewicz S and Santella A, Suggestive contours for conveying shape. ACM SIGGRAPH 2003 Papers, pp. 848–855, 2003.

[12] Yang Y, Wu C and Zhang J, Ref-NPR: Reference-based non-photorealistic radiance fields for 3D stylization. IEEE/ CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 12345–12354, 2023.

[13] Pharr M, Jakob W and Humphreys G, Physically Based Rendering: From Theory to Implementation, 4th ed., Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2023.

[14] NVIDIA, RTX path tracing: The future of real-time graphics. GDC 2023 Presentation, San Francisco, CA, 2023.

[15] Unity Technologies, Mobile game performance: Best practices for frame budget and optimization. Unity Developer Guide, 2021.

[16] Cole F, Golovinskiy A, Limpaecher A, et al., How well do line drawings depict shape. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 1–9, 2009.

[17] Santiago R, Journey postmortem. Game Developers Conference (GDC) Talk, San Francisco, CA, 2013.

[18] Fujibayashi T and Aonuma H, Breaking conventions with The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild. Game Developers Conference (GDC) Talk, San Francisco, CA, 2017.

[19] DeRose D, Mahler J and Kim J, The visual style of Spider- Man: Into the Spider-Verse. ACM SIGGRAPH 2019 Talks, Los Angeles, CA, 2019.

[20] Korba G, Hades: Art direction and stylized VFX. Game Developers Conference (GDC) Talk, San Francisco, CA, 2021.

[21] Kerbl B, Kopanas G, Leimkühler T and Müller T, 3D Gaussian splatting for real-time radiance field rendering. ACM SIGGRAPH 2023 Papers, 2023.

[22] Chen H, Deng X and Zheng C, A survey on neural stylization of 3D data. International Journal of Computer Vision (IJCV), vol. 131, no. 5, pp. 1103–1134, 2023.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-19

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 6 (2025): Volume 3, Issue 6

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2025 by the authors.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.