Dark Matter-Dark Energy Coupling: A New Paradigm in Cosmology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61173/wpk8g489Keywords:
Dark energy, dark matter, cosmological parameters, cosmological tensions, beyond ΛCDM cosmologyAbstract
The search for interactions between dark matter and dark energy represents a frontier in modern cosmology as it challenges the standard ΛCDM paradigm where these components evolve independently. This review synthesizes theoretical and observational advances in understanding such couplings, which offer compelling solutions to longstanding cosmological problems. Theoretically, interacting models naturally address the cosmic coincidence problem through dynamical attractor solutions, while phenomenologically they provide mechanisms to alleviate tensions in Hubble constant and structure growth measurements. This paper demonstrates how different coupling scenarios such as scalar field interactions, modified gravity theories, and phenomenological models distinctly modify both cosmic expansion history and structure formation. Current constraints from cosmological probes, including CMB, large-scale structure, and supernovae data, severely restrict but do not eliminate viable parameter space for interactions. The coupling strength is constrained to ξ ≲ 0.01 which leaves room for detectable signals in next-generation surveys. Future observations from CMB-S4, Euclid, and LSST will provide critical tests through multi-messenger approaches combining expansion history and growth of structure measurements.
References
[1] Planck Collaboration. Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 2020, 641: A6.
[2] PEEBLES P J E, RATRA B. The cosmological constant and dark energy. Reviews of Modern Physics, 2003, 75(2): 559-606.
[3] RIESS A G, FILIPPENKO A V, CHALLIS P, et al. Observational evidence from supernovae for an accelerating universe and a cosmological constant. The Astronomical Journal, 1998, 116(3): 1009-1038.
[4] DI VALENTINO E, MELCHIORRI A, SILK J. Cosmology intertwined: A review of the particle physics, astrophysics, and cosmology associated with the cosmological tensions and anomalies. Journal of High Energy Astrophysics, 2022, 34: 49- 211.
[5] AMENDOLA L. Coupled quintessence. Physical Review D, 2000, 62(4): 043511.
[6] WANG B, MENG X H. Cosmological constraints on interacting dark energy models. International Journal of Modern Physics D, 2005, 14(1): 1347-1362.
[7] ZIMDAHL W, PAVÓN D, CHIMENTO L P. Interacting quintessence. Physics Letters B, 2001, 521(3-4): 133-138.
[8] BERTONE G, HOOPER D, SILK J. Particle dark matter: evidence, candidates and constraints. Physics Reports, 2005, 405(5-6): 279-390.
[9] RUBIN V C, FORD W K. Rotation of the Andromeda nebula from a spectroscopic survey of emission regions. The Astrophysical Journal, 1970, 159: 379-403.
[10] JUNGMAN G, KAMIONKOWSKI M, GRIEST K. Supersymmetric dark matter. Physics Reports, 1996, 267(5-6): 195-373.
[11] PECCEI R D, QUINN H R. CP conservation in the presence of pseudoparticles. Physical Review Letters, 1977, 38(25): 1440- 1443.
[12] DODELSON S, WIDROW L M. Sterile neutrinos as dark matter. Physical Review Letters, 1994, 72(1): 17-20. Dean&Francis ISSN 2959-6157
[13] WEINBERG S. The cosmological constant problem. Reviews of Modern Physics, 1989, 61(1): 1-23.
[14] RATRA B, PEEBLES P J E. Cosmological consequences of a rolling homogeneous scalar field. Physical Review D, 1988, 37(12): 3406-3427.
[15] HINSHAW G, LARSON D, KOMATSU E, et al. Nine-year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) observations: cosmological parameter results. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 2013, 208(2): 19.
[16] SCOLNIC D M, JONES D O, REST A, et al. The complete light-curve sample of spectroscopically confirmed SNe Ia from Pan-STARRS1 and cosmological constraints from the combined pantheon sample. The Astrophysical Journal, 2018, 859(2): 101.
[17] BRAX P, VAN DE BRUCK C, DAVIS A C, et al. f(R) gravity and chameleon theories. Physical Review D, 2008, 78(10): 104021.
[18] CLEMSON T, KOYAMA K, MAARTENS R, et al. Interacting dark energy: constraints and degeneracies. Physical Review D, 2012, 85(4): 043007.
[19] DARK ENERGY SURVEY COLLABORATION. The Dark Energy Survey. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 2016, 239(2): 23.
[20] DI VALENTINO E, MELCHIORRI A, MERSINI- HOUGHTON L, et al. Interacting dark energy in the early 2020s: A promising solution to the H0 and cosmic shear tensions. Physics of the Dark Universe, 2020, 30: 100666.
[21] POURTSIDOU A, TRAM T. Reconciling CMB and structure growth measurements with dark energy interactions. Physical Review D, 2016, 94(4): 043518.
[22] ARAI S, NISHIZAWA A. Generalized framework for testing gravity with gravitational-wave propagation. II. Constraints on Horndeski theory. Physical Review D, 2018, 97(10): 104038.
[23] SALVATELLI V, MARCHINI A, LÓPEZ HONORATO L G, et al. Indications of a late-time interaction in the dark sector. Physical Review Letters, 2014, 113(18): 181301.
[24] CAO S, RYAN J, RATRA B. Using the S8 tension to test three models of interacting dark matter-dark energy. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 2022, 652: A146.
[25] VALIVIITA J, MAJEROTTO E, MAARTENS R. Instability in interacting dark energy and dark matter fluids. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2008(7): 020.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 by the authors.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
