Interpretable Go AI Based on Statistical Learning: Quantifying Go Principles and Developing Lightweight Models

Authors

  • Hanyang Liu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61173/c52xvf31

Keywords:

Interpretable Artificial Intelligence (AI), Statistical Learning, Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS), Go (Weiqi), Cultural Quantification, Lightweight Modeling

Abstract

Due to its large decision space and granular human commonsense, Go, a game with eastern strategic wisdom connotations, is a tough problem for artificial intelligence. Current deep learning Go AI (e.g., AlphaGo) beats human Go players, but their decision-making is a “black box”, data-hungry and computationally expensive. In this talk, I will develop an interpretable Go AI framework based on statistical learning to quantify the traditional Go wisdom (“Go-theory”) and to construct lightweight Go AI models in a limited-resource environment. With the help of probabilistic modeling, Bayesian updating, and cultural rule quantification, an interpretable, computationally efficient, and culturally mathematical expression is attempted in this work. The following contributions are expected: 1) probability-pruned Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) guided by confidence interval; 2) define Go-Theory Index (GTI) as a statistical consistency measure with human heuristics. I expect that my model could provide interpretable predictions, transparent explanations, and pedagogical use in Go education.

References

[1] Zhang Sheng, Long Qiang, Kong Yinan, et al., “Weiqi Dean&Francis ISSN 2959-6157 rengong zhinen AlphaGo xilie suanfa de yuanli yu fangfa (Principles and methods of the Go AI AlphaGo series),” Keji Daobao, vol. 41, no. 07, pp. 79–97, 2023.

[2] Cheng Siyu, Lin Feng, “Jisuanji Weiqi AlphaGo suanfa dui renlei Weiqi suanfa de yingxiang (The impact of the AlphaGo algorithm on human Go strategies),” Zhongguo Keji Xinxi, no. 02, pp. 40–41, 2019.

[3] Chen Dongyan, Lu Chang, “Cong AlphaGo kan jiqi xuexi (Machine learning from the perspective of AlphaGo),” Keji Chuangxin Daobao, vol. 17, no. 13, pp. 146–148, 2020.

[4] X. Chao, G. Kou, T. Li, and Y. Peng, “Jie Ke versus AlphaGo: A ranking approach using decision-making method for large-scale data with incomplete information,” Eur. J. Oper. Res., 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2017.07.030.

[5] D. Watson and L. Floridi, “The explanation game: A formal framework for interpretable machine learning,” Synthese, vol. 199, pp. 10805–10828, 2020.

[6] K. Ueno and K. Takami, “Visualizing human game strategies with imitation learning and explainable AI for learning environments,” Int. J. Interact. AI Res., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 14–27, 2024.

[7] R. Alvarado, K. Yee, and L. Villarreal, “Go game formal revealing by Ising model,” arXiv preprint, arXiv:1710.07360, 2017.

[8] Y. Tian et al., “ELF OpenGo: An analysis and open reimplementation of AlphaZero,” arXiv preprint, arXiv:1902.04522, 2019.

[9] C. Ciolino, D. Noever, and J. Kalin, “The Go Transformer: Natural language modeling for game play,” arXiv preprint, arXiv:2007.03500, 2020.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-19