A Study of Carbon Colonialism and Inequality in the Global South Based on Ecocritical Theory

Authors

  • Wenbo Pan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61173/3wys2c58

Keywords:

Ecocritical Theory, Carbon Colonialism, Global South, Inequality

Abstract

In response to the accelerating impacts of global climate change and the realities of the Anthropocene, nation-states have implemented international agreements such as the Kyoto Protocol and the Paris Agreement to mitigate climate change and curb environmental degradation stemming from excessive carbon emissions. Through carbon market operations, these nation-states aim to achieve carbon neutrality and uphold the integrity of the Earth’s ecological system. Nevertheless, the nations of the Global South are enduring some of the harshest effects of environmental degradation, despite their limited historical responsibility for greenhouse gas emissions. This inequality is further exacerbated within climate change response strategies, where developed nations displace the costs of emissions reduction and ecological crises onto developing countries via policy mechanisms, industrial transfers, and technological restrictions, thus maintaining inequality. Based on a literature review and case studies, this paper employs an ecocritical framework to investigate how carbon colonialism shapes the use and management of environmental resources in the Global South through political-economic structures. Besides, it further explores the underpinning power dynamics and the logic of capital accumulation. The results reveal that carbon colonialism shapes the dynamics of traditional colonialism and North-South inequalities through climate politics, carbon markets, and green technology. In addition, a political-economic approach examines global environment and guides systemic change for justice and sustainability.

References

[1] Stevenson, N. (2021). Critical theory in the Anthropocene: Marcuse, Marxism and ecology. European Journal of Social Theory, 24(2), 211-226.

[2] Nixon, R. (2013). Slow violence and the environmentalism of the poor (Paperback ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

[3] Bachram, H. (2004). Climate fraud and carbon colonialism: The new trade in greenhouse gases. Capitalism, Nature, Socialism, 15(4), 5-20.

[4] Blunt, A., & McEwan, C. (2002). Postcolonial geographies. London: Continuum.

[5] WRI. (2021). Historical CO₂ emissions database. https:// www.wri.org/insights/history-carbon-dioxide-emissions

[6] OECD. (2022). Climate finance provided and mobilised by developed countries in 2016-2020. https://www. greenfinanceplatform.org/research/climate-finance-providedand-mobilised-developed-countries-2016-2020

[7] Kikstra, J. S., et al. (2022). The IPCC Sixth Assessment Report WGIII climate assessment of mitigation pathways: From emissions to global temperatures. Geoscientific Model Development, 15(24), 9075-9109.

[8] Koh, K. L., et al. (2010). Crucial issues in climate change and the Kyoto Protocol: Asia and the world (1st ed.). Singapore: World Scientific. https://www.worldscientific.com/worldscibook s/10.1142/7347#t=aboutBook

[9] United Nations. (2019). E-waste and the Basel Convention. https://hlpf.un.org/inputs/basel-convention.

[10] World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). (2020). World Intellectual Property Indicators 2020. Geneva: WIPO. Retrieved August 20, 2025, from https://www.wipo.int/edocs/ pubdocs/en/wipo_pub_941_2020.pdf

[11] World Trade Organization (WTO). (2015). Doha Development Agenda negotiations: Intellectual property and climate change. Geneva: WTO. https://www.wto.org/english/ thewto_e/whatis_e/tif_e/doha1_e.htm

[12] United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). (2021). World Investment Report 2021: Investing in sustainable recovery. https://unctad.org/system/files/officialdocument/wir2021_en.pdf

[13] Okereke, C. (2010). Climate justice and the international regime. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 1(3), 462-474.

[14] United Nations Economic Commission for Africa (UNECA). (2018). Seventh Conference on Climate Change and Development in Africa (CCDA-VII). https://multimedia.uneca. org/handle/10855.1/246 Dean&Francis Wenbo Pan

[15] United Nations Climate Change (UNFCCC). (2021). Report on Climate Finance Delivery Plan. Bonn: UNFCCC. Retrieved August 20, 2025, from https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/ resource/UNFCCC_Annual_Report_2021.pdf

[16] Pauw, W. P., et al. (2020). Conditional nationally determined contributions in the Paris Agreement: Foothold for equity or Achilles heel? Climate Policy, 20(4), 468–484.

[17] Carruthers, D. (2008). Environmental justice in Latin America: Problems, promise, and practice. NACLA Report on the Americas, 41(4), 48.

[18] Zhang, F., & Gallagher, K. S. (2016). Innovation and technology transfer through global value chains: Evidence from China’s PV industry. Energy Policy, 94, 191-203.

[19] FAO. (2017). Climate-smart agriculture sourcebook. https:// www.fao.org/climate-smart-agriculture-sourcebook/en/

Downloads

Published

2025-12-19