Plant-Based Meat as a Low-Carbon and Biodiverse Food Solution in the Anthropocene
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61173/mg14v915Keywords:
plant-based meat, anthropocene, sustainable food systems, biodiversity conservation, socioeconomic barriersAbstract
Global food systems, particularly conventional livestock production, are among the key sources of climate change, resource degradation, and loss of biodiversity, which jeopardize planetary stability in the Anthropocene. This paper will be addressing the potential of plantbased meat as a sustainable low-carbon food that can be applied to mitigate environmental pressure and to support biodiversity conservation. This research is conducted through systematic review and synthesis of the current scientific literature, contrasting data on environmental effects of plant versus animal meat production, comparing socioeconomic barriers to uptake, and comparing proposed governance strategies. Analysis confirms plant-based meat has significant climate and resource benefits, including much lower greenhouse gas emissions, negligible land and water usage, and higher resource efficiency compared with traditional meat. Besides, it decreases ecosystem pressure via deforestation reduction, habitat loss, and pollution, thus fostering biodiversity and ecological resilience. However, adoption is constrained by socioeconomic variables such as higher cost, low consumer acceptability, and low public awareness. To the study, there is a requirement for a cooperative multi-stakeholder response including enabling government policies, business technological and marketing innovations, and civil society-led education initiatives to overcome these challenges. Plant-based meat thus provides a pragmatic and disruptive path towards building a more resilient, equitable food system for the world.
References
[1] Asgar, Mohammad Ali, et al. “Non-meat protein alternatives: Opportunities and challenges”. Food Science and Human Wellness, vol. 8, no. 1, 2019, pp. 54–60.
[2] Bhat, Zakiya F., et al. “Plant-based meat analogs: Health, environmental, and technical aspects”. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, vol. 60, no. 16, 2020, pp. 2653–2670.
[3] Clark, Michael, and David Tilman. “Comparative analysis of environmental impacts of agricultural production systems, agricultural input efficiency, and food choice”. Environmental Research Letters, vol. 12, no. 6, 2017, pp. 1–12.
[4] European Commission. “EU rules on the labelling of meat substitutes”. 2021.
[5] FAO. Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Livestock: Mitigation Opportunities. Food and Agriculture Organization, 2022.
[6] Gerber, Pierre J., et al. Tackling Climate Change Through Livestock: A Global Assessment of Emissions and Mitigation Opportunities. FAO, 2013.
[7] He, J., et al. “Government support and subsidies for alternative proteins”. Sustainable Food Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 2, 2020, pp. 100–112.
[8] Henchion, Maeve, et al. “Future protein supply and demand: Strategies and considerations”. Trends in Food Science & Technology, vol. 75, 2018, pp. 1–15.
[9] Hepperly, Paul, et al. “Innovations in plant-based meat production”. Journal of Food Engineering, vol. 248, 2019, pp. 30–38.
[10] Joshi, Vani K., and Sujata Kumar. “A review on microorganisms based protein: Technological advances and potential applications”. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Dean&Francis Baoqing Yang Nutrition, vol. 55, no. 7, 2015, pp. 1000–1015.
[11] Michel, Frederic, et al. “Consumer perceptions of plantbased meat substitutes”. Appetite, vol. 159, 2021, pp. 104–117.
[12] Poore, J., and T. Nemecek. “Reducing food’s environmental impacts through producers and consumers”. Science, vol. 360, no. 6392, 2018, pp. 987–992.
[13] Ripple, William J., et al. “Ruminants, climate change and climate policy”. Nature Climate Change, vol. 6, 2016, pp. 72–75.
[14] Stephens, Nathan, et al. “Bringing cultured meat to market: Technical, socio-political, and regulatory challenges in cellular agriculture”. Trends in Food Science&Technology, vol. 78, 2018, pp. 155–166.
[15] Szejda, Kristin, et al. “Consumer acceptance of plant-based meat alternatives”. Journal of Food Products Marketing, vol. 26, no. 3, 2020, pp. 1–20.
[16] Tziva, Maria, et al. “Civil society engagement in sustainable protein transitions”. Sustainability Science, vol. 15, 2020, pp. 75–89.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 by the authors.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
