Solid-State vs. Liquid Electrolytes: A Comparative Review

Authors

  • Ziyu Guan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61173/32fghd22

Keywords:

Solid-state electrolytes, liquid electrolytes, thermal stability, dendrite suppression, thermal runaway mitigation

Abstract

Considering the increasingly stringent safety and energy density requirements of lithium-ion batteries, scientists have focused more on solid-state lithium-ion battery research in recent years. Solid-state electrolytes (SSEs) have emerged as a transformative solution to the intrinsic limitations of conventional liquid electrolytes, particularly in mitigating safety hazards and enhancing energy density for next-generation batteries. This review systematically contrasts the fundamental mechanisms of SSEs and liquid electrolytes, demonstrating how SSEs address critical challenges. Firstly, the superior thermal stability eliminates flammable components, fundamentally preventing thermal runaway chains. Secondly the robust mechanical properties physically suppress lithium dendrite penetration Finally, the extended electrochemical windows enable stable operation with high-voltage/high-capacity electrodes. Despite these advantages, interfacial resistance and high manufacturing costs remain key barriers to large-scale adoption. Future advancements hinge on innovative interface engineering, scalable synthesis of stable SSE materials (e.g., oxygen-doped sulfides), and system-level designs such as bipolar stacking. Emerging applications in multivalent-ion batteries and solid-state lithium-sulfur systems are also discussed as pivotal frontiers for sustainable energy storage.

References

[1] Dunn B, Kamath H, Tarascon J-M. Electrical energy storage [15] Janek J, Zeier W G. A solid future for battery development. for the grid: A battery of choices. Science, 2011, 334(6058): Nature Energy, 2016, 1(9): 16141. 928-935. [16] Monroe C, Newman J. The impact of elastic deformation on

[2] Tarascon J M, Armand M. Issues and challenges facing deposition kinetics at lithium/polymer interfaces. Journal of The rechargeable lithium batteries. Nature, 2001, 414(6861): 359- Electrochemical Society, 2005, 152(2): A396. 367. [17] Sharafi A, Meyer H M, Nanda J, Wolfenstine J, Sakamoto

[3] Doughty D, Roth E P. A general discussion of Li-ion battery J. Characterizing the Li–Li7La3Zr2O12 interface stability and safety. Electrochemical Society Interface, 2012, 21(2): 37-44. kinetics as a function of temperature and current density. Journal

[4] Xu K. Electrolytes and interphases in Li-ion batteries and of Power Sources, 2016, 302: 135-139. beyond. Chemical Reviews, 2014, 114(23): 11503-11618. [18] Kuwata N, Kawamura J, Toribami K, Hattori T, Sata N.

[5] Janek J, Zeier W G. A solid future for battery development. Thin-film lithium-ion battery with amorphous solid electrolyte Nature Energy, 2016, 1(9): 16141. fabricated by pulsed laser deposition. Electrochemistry

[6] Manthiram A, Yu X, Wang S. Lithium battery chemistries Communications, 2004, 6(4): 417-421. enabled by solid-state electrolytes. Nature Reviews Materials, [19] Kato Y, Hori S, Saito T, Suzuki K, Hirayama M. High- 2017, 2(4): 16103. power all-solid-state batteries using sulfide superionic

[7] Choi N S, et al. FEC additive for silicon anodes. Journal of conductors. Nature Energy, 2016, 1(4): 16030. The Electrochemical Society, 2010, 157: A1045-1049. [20] Han F, Westover A S, Yue J, Fan X, Wang F. High electronic

[8] Zhang Sheng Shui. A review on electrolyte additives for conductivity as the origin of lithium dendrite formation within lithium-ion batteries. Journal of Power Sources, 2006, 162(2): solid electrolytes. Nature Energy, 2019, 4: 187-196. 1379-1394. [21] Wang Y, Richards W D, Ong S P, Miara L J, Kim J C.

[9] Wu Fanglin, Fang Shan, Kuenzel M, Mullaliu A, Kim J Design principles for solid-state lithium superionic conductors. K. Dual-anion ionic liquid electrolyte enables stable Ni-rich Nature Materials, 2015, 14(10): 1026-1031. cathodes in lithium-metal batteries. Joule, 2021, 5(8): 2177- [22] Wan L, Wood M, Wood B C. Integrated experiment-theory 2194. approach to elucidate complex interfacial chemistry in solid-

[10] Finegan D P, Scheel M, Robinson J B, et al. Thermal state batteries. ECS Meeting Abstracts, 2019. behaviour of lithium-ion electrolytes in commercial pouch cells [23] Koerver R, Aygün I, Leichtweiß T, Dietrich C, Zhang W. under abuse conditions. Joule, 2020, 4(10): 2219-2235. Capacity fade in solid-state batteries: interphase formation

[11] Han Xiaogang, Gong Yunhui, Fu K K, He Xingfeng, Hitz and chemomechanical processes in nickel-rich layered oxide G T. Detection of subsurface structures underneath dendrites cathodes and lithium thiophosphate solid electrolytes. Chemistry formed on cycled lithium metal electrodes. Nature Materials, of Materials, 2017, 29(13): 5574-5582. 2016, 15(5): 549-555. [24] Kazyak E, Chen K H, Wood K N, Davis A L, Thompson

[12] Jiang Z, et al. Deciphering the degradation mechanism of T. Atomic layer deposition of the solid electrolyte garnet Ni-rich cathodes at high voltages. Advanced Energy Materials, Li7La3Zr2O12. Chemistry of Materials, 2017, 29(8): 3785- 2022, 12(15): 2200567. 3792.

[13] Pang Q, et al. Quantifying the polysulfide shuttle in lithium-

Downloads

Published

2025-10-23