Review of Roof Insulation Technologies: A Systematic Analysis of Material Properties and Structural Design
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61173/mg24f860Keywords:
Roof insulation technology, Thermal insula-tion material properties, Insulation structural design, Life cycle cost analysis, Building energy efficiencyAbstract
Objective: To optimize roof thermal insulation performance for reducing building energy consumption (accounting for 32% of global energy use) and roof heat loss (10–25%), thereby contributing to carbon neutrality goals. Method: A systematic review of core elements was conducted, encompassing: (1) insulation material properties (organic polymers, inorganic fibers, eco-materials); (2) structural designs (conventional, inverted, ventilated, green roofs); and (3) techno-economic analysis. Results: ·Materials: PIR exhibits superior fire resistance; XPS offers excellent waterproofing; aerogel demonstrates extremely low thermal conductivity. ·Structures: Inverted roofs extend waterproofing membrane lifespan; ventilated roofs effectively reduce cooling loads; green roofs provide ecological benefits. ·Techno-economics: Analysis identified XPS-based inverted roofs as the most cost-effective solution (lowest lifecycle cost, shorter payback period). Region-specific optimizations were recommended (e.g., PU/PIR with ventilation for cold climates; rock wool/glass wool with reflective coatings for hot-humid zones). ·Emerging Technologies: Potential was noted for phase change materials (PCMs), building-integrated photovoltaic-insulation systems (BIPVIS), and self-healing membranes. ·Design Principle: System design must comprehensively consider fire safety, economic viability, and ecological requirements.
References
[1] Pérez-Lombard et al. (2008). Energy and Buildings, 40(3), 394-398.
[2] Kim & Park (2020). Building Simulation, 13(5), 1129-1142.
[3] Schmidt et al. (2018). Journal of Cellular Plastics, 54(3), 551- 569.
[4] Kosny et al. (2015). Journal of Building Physics, 39(2), 115-
[136] (DIN EN 13164 discussion)
[5] Williams, F. (2021). Fire Performance of Polyisocyanurate Foam Insulation. Insulation Outlook Magazine.
[6] Building Research Establishment (BRE). (2019). Performance of PIR Insulation in Commercial Roofs: Case Study - London Financial District. Report No. FB 87.
[7] BS EN 13501-1:2018. Fire classification of construction products and building elements. Classification using data from reaction to fire tests.
[8] Fischer, K., et al. (2022). Fire Safety Journal, 131, 103596. (Rockwool fire delay)
[9] ISO 29767:2019. Thermal insulating products for building applications — Determination of short-term water absorption by partial immersion.
[10] Asdrubali, F., et al. (2015). A review of sustainable materials for acoustic applications. Building Acoustics, 22(3-4), 151-179.
[11] Dubois, M-C., et al. (2020). Energy savings from enhanced acoustic and thermal insulation in French residential buildings. Energy and Buildings, 223, 110182.
[12] Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS).
[2021] . Whole Life Carbon Assessment for the Built Environment.
[13] Lstiburek, J. (2016). Insulation Materials: The Comparative Environmental Impacts. Building Science Corporation Report.
[14] Gao, T., et al. (2020). Silica Aerogel Composites for Building Insulation: Synthesis, Properties and Applications. Advanced Engineering Materials, 22(5), 1900868.
[15] IEA EBC Annex 65. (2023). Long-Term Performance of Super-Insulating Materials (SIM) in Building Components. Project Summary Report.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 by the authors.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
