Research on the Design and Control of Finger Exoskeleton Rehabilitation Robot

Authors

  • Mingqin Wen

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61173/ffqwtj88

Keywords:

Finger Exoskeleton (Exo) Robots, Hu-man-Computer Interaction (HCI), Rehabilitation Trade-offs

Abstract

Finger motor dysfunction caused by nerve injury or musculoskeletal diseases seriously affects the quality of life of patients, while traditional rehabilitation methods lack accuracy and scalability. Although exoskeleton (Exo) robots offer promising solutions, existing designs still face challenges in terms of structural rigidity, control accuracy, and human-computer interaction for finger joint rehabilitation. This paper systematically reviews the finger Exo technology, with a focus on analyzing three key aspects: structural design, driving mechanism, and interaction mode. Through literature comparison and analysis, it is found that the rigid structure has a relatively high torque output (about 10.3 Newtons of grip), but insufficient comfort, while the flexible design improves wear resistance (weight 150-200 grams), but sacrifices load-bearing capacity. Hybrid power solutions and advanced drivers show the potential to bridge these gaps. Human-computer interaction technologies such as Surface electromyography (SEMG) can achieve a motion range of 58.5° for joints, but there is a problem of signal noise. The key research results reveal the trade-offs among various performance indicators: the balance between accuracy (0.2 mm position error) and adaptability, as well as the trade-off between force output (15 N·m torque) and portability. The future development direction emphasizes artificial intelligence-driven control algorithms, modular design, and the use of cost-effective materials to enhance clinical applicability. This study provides a systematic framework for optimizing finger Exo, indicating the need for multidisciplinary innovation to achieve personalized and efficient rehabilitation treatment.

References

[1] Cempini M, Cortese M, Vitiello N. A powered finger–thumb wearable hand exoskeleton with self-aligning joint axes. IEEE/ ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 2015, 20(2): 705-716.

[2] Zhao H, Jalving J, Huang R, et al. A helping hand: soft orthosis with integrated optical strain sensors and EMG control. IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine, 2016, 23(3): 55-64.

[3] Song J, Zhu A, Zhang J, et al. Design and grasping experiment research of hand exoskeleton driven by lasso. Journal of Xi’an Jiaotong University, 2023, 57(8): 115-126.

[4] Cempini M, Cortese M, Vitiello N. A powered finger–thumb wearable hand exoskeleton with self-aligning joint axes. IEEE/ ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 2015, 20(2): 705-716.

[5] Agarwal P, Deshpande A D. An index finger exoskeleton with series elastic actuation for rehabilitation. 2015.

[6] Zhong S, Yu S. Structural design and analysis of exoskeleton for hand function rehabilitation. Machinery Design & Research, 2020, 36(3): 1-7.

[7] Exo-Glove: a wearable robot for the hand with a soft tendon routing system. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 2015.

[8] Polygerinos P, Wang Z, Galloway K C, et al. Soft robotic glove for combined assistance and at-home rehabilitation. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 2015, 73: 135-143.

[9] Sarac M, Solazzi M, Frisoli A. Design requirements of generic hand exoskeletons and survey of hand exoskeletons for rehabilitation, assistive, or haptic use. 2015.

[10] Rehab-Robotics Company Limited. Hand of Hope. Available: https://www.rehab-robotics.com.hk/

[11] Reha-Stim Medtec Inc. Reha-Digit. Available: https://rehastim.com/reha-digit/

[12] Tran P, Jeong S, Herrin K R, Desai J P. Review: hand exoskeleton systems, clinical rehabilitation practices, and future prospects. IEEE Transactions on Medical Robotics and Bionics, 2021, 3(3): 606-622.

[13] Hong K Y, Lim J H, Nasrallah F, et al. A soft exoskeleton for hand assistive and rehabilitation application using pneumatic actuators with variable stiffness. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2015: 4967-4972.

[14] Anonymous. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 2017, 116: 1-13.

[15] Anonymous. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 2013, 19(1): 327-338.

[16] Lee S W, Landers K A, Park H S. Development of a biomimetic hand exotendon device (BiomHED) for restoration of functional hand movement post-stroke. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 2014, 22(4): 886-898.

[17] Tran P, Jeong S, Wolf S L, et al. Patient-specific, voicecontrolled, robotic FLEXotendon Glove-II system for spinal cord injury. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 2020, 5(2): 898-905.

[18] Liu J, Zhou P. A novel myoelectric pattern recognition strategy for hand function restoration after incomplete cervical spinal cord injury. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 2012, 21(1): 96-103.

[19] Zhang X, Zhou P. Sample entropy analysis of surface EMG for improved muscle activity onset detection against spurious background spikes. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, 2012, 22(6): 901-907.

[20] Tran P, Jeong S, Desai J P. Voice-controlled flexible Exotendon Glove-II system for spinal cord injury. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 2020, 5(2): 898-905.

[21] Jeong S, Tran P, Desai J P. Integration of self-sealing suction cups on the FLEXotendon Glove-II robotic exoskeleton system. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 2020, 5(2): 867- 874.

[22] du Plessis T, Djouani K, Oosthuizen C A. A review of active hand exoskeletons for rehabilitation and assistance. Robotics, 2021, 10(1): 40.

[23] Tran P, Jeong S, Herrin K R, Desai J P. Review: hand exoskeleton systems, clinical rehabilitation practices, and future prospects. IEEE Transactions on Medical Robotics and Bionics, 2021, 3(3): 606-622.

Downloads

Published

2025-08-26