The Impact of High-fiber Diet and High-starch Diet on Equine Gut Microbiota

Authors

  • Renying Lu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61173/0nrb6c77

Keywords:

Equine gut microbiota, high-fiber diet, high-starch diet, equine dietary modulation

Abstract

To better understand the health of horses, analyzing the equine gut microbiota is an inevitable step. Feeding strategies, as one of the main factor that significantly affects the microbiota composition of equine gut, has gradually become the focus of research. This paper systematically analyzes the different effects of two different dietary structures, high fiber and high starch diets, on the equine intestinal microbiota. The results of this paper show that high fiber diets can maintain a high level of alpha diversity in the equine hindgut microbiota and promote the growth of beneficial bacteria. However, high starch diets decrease microbiota α-diversity, increase the number of potentially pathogenic bacteria, and are associated with diseases such as colitis and acidosis. In addition, this paper presents recommendations for proper feeding of horses based on the latest research, highlights the importance of high-fiber diets by comparing the two diets, and summarizes some feeding recommendations to provide horse breeders with the right feeding ideas, aiming to contribute to the field of equine health.

References

[1] Chaucheyras-Durand, F., Sacy, A., Karges, K et.al. (2022). Gastro-Intestinal Microbiota in Equines and Its Role in Health and Disease: The Black Box Opens. Microorganisms, 10(12), p.2517. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10122517.

[2] Harris, P.A., Ellis, A.D., Fradinho, M.J et.al. (2016). Review: Feeding conserved forage to horses: recent advances and recommendations. animal, 11(6), pp.958–967. doi:https://doi. org/10.1017/s1751731116002469.

[3] Kauter, A., Epping, L., Semmler, T.et.al. (2019). The gut microbiome of horses: current research on equine enteral microbiota and future perspectives. Animal Microbiome, 1(1). doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s42523-019-0013-3.

[4] Mshelia, E.S., Adamu, L., Wakil, Y.et.al. (2018). The association between gut microbiome, sex, age and body condition scores of horses in Maiduguri and its environs. Microbial Pathogenesis, 118, pp.81–86. doi:https://doi. org/10.1016/j.micpath.2018.03.018.

[5] Metcalf, J.L., Song, S.J., Morton, J.T et.al.(2017b). Evaluating the impact of domestication and captivity on the horse gut microbiome. Scientific Reports, [online] 7(1), p.15497. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-15375-9.

[6] Boucher, L., Leduc, L., Leclère, M et.al. (2024b). Current Understanding of Equine Gut Dysbiosis and Microbiota Manipulation Techniques: Comparison with Current Knowledge in Other Species. Animals, [online] 14(5), p.758. doi:https://doi. org/10.3390/ani14050758.

[7] Ang, L., Vinderola, G., Endo, A. et.al. (2022). Gut Microbiome Characteristics in feral and domesticated horses from different geographic locations. Communications Biology, [online] 5(1), pp.1–10. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-022- 03116-2.

[8] Raspa, F., Chessa, S., Domenico B et.al. (2024b). Microbiota characterization throughout the digestive tract of horses fed a high-fiber vs. a high-starch diet. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 11. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2024.1386135.

[9] Brandi, L.A., Nunes, A.T., Faleiros, C.Aet.al. (2024). Dietary Energy Sources Affect Cecal and Fecal Microbiota of Healthy Horses. Animals, [online] 14(23), pp.3494–3494. doi:https://doi. org/10.3390/ani14233494.

[10] Tackebrandt, Erko, and R. Hespell. (2006). “The family succinivibrionaceae.” The prokaryotes 3 (2006): 419-429.

[11] Baumgartner, M., Boisson, T., Erhard, M.H et.al. (2020). Common Feeding Practices Pose a Risk to the Welfare of Horses When Kept on Non-Edible Bedding. Animals, 10(3), p.411. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10030411.

[12] Cooke, C.G., Gibb, Z., Grupen, C.G et.al.(2023b). Prebiotics and Synbiotics in Equine Health and Disease: Probiotics and Synbiotics for Horses. International Journal of Equine Science, [online] 2(2), pp.37–47.

Downloads

Published

2025-08-26