From Detection to Action: Overcoming the Last-Mile Challenges in Seafloor Geohazard Monitoring
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61173/vq0zzm33Keywords:
Seafloor Geohazard Monitoring, Early Warning Systems, Sensor Reliability and Data. Integra-tionAbstract
Submarine geohazards, including earthquakes, landslides, and volcanic activity, pose a series of complex threats to coastal communities and critical offshore infrastructure. While recent advances in seafloor monitoring technologies (e.g., distributed acoustic sensing, AI-enhanced seismometers) have improved detection capabilities, significant gaps persist between data collection and actionable warnings. This study identifies three critical issues: (1) hardware limitations, where 40% of deep-sea sensors fail within 18 months due to extreme pressures and corrosion; (2) data latency, with even advanced systems like Japan’s DAS networks suffering 8–15-second delays in tsunami detection; and (3) institutional fragmentation, evidenced by 17 incompatible data formats across global OBS networks, leading to 22% data loss. We evaluate emerging solutions, from graphene-based pressure-resistant sensors to automated decision pipelines and prove how integrated systems could reduce warning times by 50% while cutting the unnecessary costs. The findings also point out an urgent need for standardized protocols and cross-sector collaboration to transform monitoring science into the more effective risk mitigation.
References
[1] Goto, K., et al. (2017). Paleotsunami deposits along the Japan Trench: Recurrence intervals and implications for hazard assessment. Marine Geology, 391, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.margeo.2017.06.012
[2] Wang, Y., et al. (2022). Seismic coupling heterogeneity in the Manila Trench revealed by geodetic and seismic data. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 127(8), e2022JB024567.
[3] Zhan, L. (2020). Postseismic fluid migration and its role in triggering shallow earthquakes after megathrust events. Nature Communications, 11(1), 3289. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467- 020-17054-2
[4] Romanowicz, B. (2022). Deep-sea fiber-optic cables as transformative tools for ocean-bottom seismology. Science, 376(6592), 456-460. https://doi. org/10.1126/science.abo1939
[5] Huang, X., et al. (2023). Real-time machine learning for earthquake early warning in subduction zones. Seismological Research Letters, 94(3), 1234-1247.
[6] Lovholt, F., et al. (2022). Global probabilistic tsunami hazard assessment: Advances from the 2022 UN Ocean Decade. Earth- Science Reviews, 231, 104075. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.earscirev.2022.104075
[7] ASEAN. (2024). Guidelines for regional tsunami warning Dean&Francis ISSN 2959-6157 and evacuation planning in Southeast Asia. ASEAN Secretariat.
[8] World Bank. (2023). Building resilient coastal infrastructure: Lessons from recent tsunamis. World Bank Group. https://www. worldbank.org/en/topic/disasterriskmanagement/publication/ resilient-coasts
[9] Wilcock, W., et al. (2022). Hydroacoustic monitoring of slow-slip events along oceanic transform faults. Geophysical Research Letters, 49(15), e2022GL099876.
[10] Romanowicz, B. (2023). Unraveling the mechanics of slow earthquakes in the Hikurangi subduction zone. Nature Geoscience, 16(4), 321-328. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561- 023-01156-9
[11] Sladen, A., et al. (2023). The 2023 Java Trench earthquake: A rare tsunami earthquake captured by modern networks. Science Advances, 9(24), eadf8192. [ 1 2 ] C r e s p i , M . , e t a l . ( 2 0 2 2 ) . H i g h - r e s o l u t i o n mapping of the Sunda Trench reveals complex fault segmentation. Tectonics, 41(6), e2022TC007432.
[13] Barnett, J., et al. (2023). Submarine landslide hazards associated with megathrust earthquakes: A global review. Reviews of Geophysics, 61(2), e2022RG000789.
[14] Huang, X., et al. (2023). Deep learning-based rapid magnitude estimation for ocean-generated earthquakes. Nature Communications, 14(1), 5678.
[15] Zhang, H., et al. (2024). AI-driven tsunami inundation modeling for urban coastal planning. Natural Hazards, 120(3), 2125-2144.
[16] Kaneda, Y. (2023). The Nankai Trough’s seismic gap: Historical patterns and future scenarios. Earthquake Science, 36(2), 89-104.
[17] Lindsey, E., et al. (2024). Coral paleoseismology: Reconstructing past tsunamis in the Coral Triangle. Quaternary Science Reviews, 327, 108532.
[18] AOGS Working Group. (2023). Best practices for oceanbottom seismometer deployment in the Asia-Pacific region. Asian Oceanic Geosciences Society.
[19] UNDRR. (2024). Global status report on tsunami preparedness 2024. United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction. https://www.undrr.org/publication/tsunamipreparedness-2024
[20] Tao, W., et al. (2023). Submarine landslide dynamics in the South China Sea: Insights from high-resolution bathymetric surveys. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 128(4), e2022JC018745. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JC018745
[21] Nakano, M., et al. (2024). Real-time detection of slowslip events using ocean-bottom seismometers in the Nankai Trough. Nature Geoscience, 17(3), 210-218. https://doi. org/10.1038/s41561-024-01392-7
[22] Global Seismographic Network. (2024). Annual report on global oceanic seismicity patterns (2023-2024). Incorporated Research Institutions for Seismology.
[23] Pacific Tsunami Warning Center. (2024). Operational protocols for tsunami warning dissemination in the Pacific region. NOAA.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 by the authors.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
