<b>Integrating Traditional Statistical Methods</b> <b>and Machine Learning for Enhanced</b> <b>Precipitation Forecasting</b>
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61173/besdw833Keywords:
Precipitation , weather forecasting, machinelearningAbstract
This study investigates the key meteorological factors influencing precipitation by integrating traditional statistical methods with advanced machine learning techniques. Five critical variables - sunshine, cloud cover, global radiation, barometric pressure and snow depth - were selected for analysis. The results show an inverse relationship between sunshine hours and precipitation, indicating that reduced sunshine correlates with an increased likelihood of precipitation. In addition, higher cloud cover significantly increases the probability of precipitation, while low air pressure is closely associated with greater precipitation activity. Although global radiation shows a weak positive correlation, its effect is overshadowed by other variables and snow depth has no significant effect overall. Despite the relatively low explanatory power of the model (R² = 0.148), this research highlights the complexity of precipitation dynamics. The results provide valuable insights for improving precipitation forecasting, particularly in urban environments such as London, and highlight the need for future studies to include additional variables such as topography and wind speed to improve prediction accuracy. By combining statistical and machine learning approaches, this study contributes to the ongoing discourse on effective precipitation forecasting in the face of evolving climate challenges.
References
[1] Hamed K H, Ramachandra Rao A. A modified Mann-Kendall trend test for autocorrelated data. Journal of Hydrology, 1998, 204(1): 182-196.
[2] Kisi O, Shiri J. Precipitation forecasting using wavelet- Dean&Francis Pinjie Lyu genetic programming and wavelet-neuro-fuzzy conjunction models. Water Resources Management, 2011, 25(13): 3135- 3152.
[3] Coulibaly P, Baldwin C K. Nonstationary hydrological time series forecasting using nonlinear dynamic methods. Journal of Hydrology, 2005, 307(4): 164-174.
[4] Belgiu M, Drăguţ L. Random Forest in remote sensing: A review of applications and Future Directions. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 2016, 114: 24-31.
[5] Salas J D, Obeysekera J. Revisiting the concepts of return period and risk for nonstationary Hydrologic Extreme Events. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 2014, 19(3): 554-568.
[6] Shi X, Chen Z, Wang H, Yeung D Y. Convolutional LSTM Network: A Machine Learning Approach for Precipitation Nowcasting. Cornell University Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2015.
[7] Khaliq M N, Ouarda T B, Gachon P, Sushama L, St-Hilaire A. Identification of hydrological trends in the presence of serial and cross correlations: A review of selected methods and their application to annual flow regimes of Canadian rivers. Journal of Hydrology, 2009, 368(4): 117-130.
[8] Hamed K H. Trend detection in hydrologic data: The mann– kendall trend test under the scaling hypothesis. Journal of Hydrology, 2008, 349(3): 350-363.
[9] Venkata Rao G, Venkata Reddy K, et al. Spatio-temporal analysis of rainfall extremes in the flood-prone Nagavali and Vamsadhara basins in eastern India. Weather and Climate Extremes, 2020, 29: 100265.
[10] Trenberth K. Changes in precipitation with climate change. Climate Research, 2011, 47(1): 123-138.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 by the authors.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
